Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 10073 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2000 08:05:16 -0000 Received: from hyper.activeisp.com (195.139.101.105) by 63.211.145.10 with SMTP; 13 Jan 2000 08:05:16 -0000 Received: from smtp.activeisp.com (inter.activeisp.com [195.139.101.100]) by hyper.activeisp.com (2.5 Build 2639 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with ESMTP id JAA00079 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:05:51 +0100 Received: from klausprim ([193.69.1.37]) by smtp.activeisp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:05:37 +0100 From: "Klaus Myrseth" To: Subject: RE: MS IIS and Apache feature war Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:04:31 +0100 Message-ID: <00ef01bf5d9c$d2862030$040a0a0a@infohwy.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <387D1F6B.9AF700EE@relativity.yi.org> Importance: Normal Commented under each section (sorry for following the thread but i could not help it :) > -----Original Message----- > From: root@universe.kendara.com [mailto:root@universe.kendara.com]On > Behalf Of Kevin A. Burton > Sent: 13. januar 2000 01:42 > To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org > Subject: Re: MS IIS and Apache feature war > > > Bill Ataras wrote: > > > > Just some thoughts here. I've been reading that MS is going after apache > > market share by adding features to IIS (ASP etc). I'm not scared, ASP has allways and will allways promote VBScript as the language that work for most things (i dont even know why they have JScript there, since it dont support evrything you can do with VBScript), and as long as there is resistance about using ASP from developers (I made my first WAP application there and it sucks for that, esp when it comes to code reuse), i dont think customers will be advised to inplement anything there. (Portability, freedom to choose your own products AFTER the web application is done ...) If a connector to TomCat is made for IIS, so customers can run IIS with tomcat, you will likely see more ppl slowly migrating from IIS to Apache in the long run, because they can do their web application development on a portable module (and once again i have to bring up how much i love the 2.2 specs webapps :)... > > > > I think java is the clear direction on the server side. I think we > > ultimately need to combine apache + java (jsp/servlets) as the "new > > apache" or in a way that clearly says apache includes jsp/servlets by > > default (not yet another mod). MS is very good at shaping a product's > > image (marketing). Apache has a killer brand and is 1st in market share. > > I'd hate to see that lost because the open source community is superior > > technically, but can't or won't (shall I say it?) "market". Why not a mod??? The user will not see the difference if Apache is preconfigured and shipped with TomCat module installed as MS do with ASP and IIS, and if you do you will still have one product not several to develop. There will allways be people using TomCat for other platforms than Apache in the future. And there will be LOTS, amongst other things because java.sun.com is linked into the Jakarta pages, and because the apache.org is getting more and more known, eaven amongst the MS users. > > > > I'm not saying add so much to apache that is crosses from web server to > > app server, but certainly jsp/servlets are part of web server space... > > and possibly jdbc with mysql - because what good are dynamic web pages > > without decent persistence. Also add ssl in september when the rsa > > patent expiires. (distribute from non-US site or something I don't > > know). > > > > Just thoughts. Java can win on the server apache has been winning so > > far, let's not drop the ball. > > Yes... but all this is IMO is marketing. ASP is just a mod to IIS > anyway... just distributed as part of the download. There is no reason > that we can't have them as separate projects and then packaging them > together on DL. Hehe nearly every platform run Apache as default webserver nowdays, so it looks like marketing works for the Apache organisation :))))....And the last reports i read was that Apache was gaining and IIS was loosing. As i mentioned earlier, ppl is prolly starting to get tired of some of the problems you get there when trying to use anything else than pure MS producs. Hehe and you allways have that uptime discussion vs. cost pr day :) I have to say that some of my claims here is subjective to some point, and i hope i don't offend to many of you guys, but think about it. How many here is running TomCat with IIS, it has to be a reason :) PS. I hope the milestone build will be stable and the <%@ include works properly...If it does I will ship a WAP application on java server pages on TomCat in 14 days :) (The customer loved the feature where i explained to them, they can migrate from windows to linux without redeveloping the WAP application. Did i mention how much i love the feature about the 2.2 specs web-app (hehe)) -- Klaus Myrseth System Consultant - Java/WAP Department (IIS-ASP portability whats that) --