Return-Path: <Jason.Carreira@usa.xerox.com>
Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 7636 invoked from network); 21 Jul 1999 21:29:37 -0000
Received: from lysithea.xerox.com (HELO lysithea.eastgw.xerox.com)
 (root@208.140.33.22)
  by apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 1999 21:29:37 -0000
Received: from pmdf1.cinops.xerox.com (pmdf1.cinops.xerox.com [13.250.20.175])
	by lysithea.eastgw.xerox.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA15109
	for <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 17:29:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON by mail.xerox.com (PMDF V5.1-12 #U3277)
 id <01JDU1QBP74W9DBLPQ@mail.xerox.com> for tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org;
 Wed,
 21 Jul 1999 17:29:17 EDT
Received: from usaxeroxbh6.MC.USA.XEROX.COM ([13.174.4.56])
 by mail.xerox.com (PMDF V5.1-12 #U3277)
 with ESMTP id <01JDU1QA6FRS9DBN66@mail.xerox.com> for
 tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 17:29:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by USAXEROXBH6 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
 id <PJ6H10F7>; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 14:28:28 -0700
Content-return: allowed
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 14:28:25 -0700
From: "Carreira, Jason" <Jason.Carreira@usa.xerox.com>
Subject: RE: request for review: server/config discussion
To: "'tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org'" <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Message-id: <DC37797EB8C3D21197280008C74C893DF119BE@USAMCMS2>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Todd [mailto:james.todd@eng.sun.com]
> till then, i've just kick started this discussion with
> a supporting "request for discussion" doc to capture the
> goals and decission points. i'm bringing to the table a
> practical perspective to a portion of code sun will be
> contributing (jswdk: servlet and jsp ri coupled with an
> http 1.0 server all implemented in 100% java which has
> an xml configuration element and is gaining more, namely
> j2ee deployment descriptors) and some ideas as to where
> this theme could/should proceed.

Would those be the XML deployment descriptors from the EJB 1.1 spec? People
on the EJB-INTEREST mailing list were not too thrilled with those, because
the data couldn't be validated by a validating parser (not sure of why, I
haven't finished my XML homework!) so maybe that would be a problem here,
too?