Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 6994 invoked from network); 22 Jul 1999 23:22:25 -0000 Received: from pop.systemy.it (root@194.20.140.28) by apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 1999 23:22:25 -0000 Received: from apache.org (pv48-pri.systemy.it [194.21.255.48]) by pop.systemy.it (8.8.8/8.8.3) with ESMTP id BAA12303 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 01:22:19 +0200 Message-ID: <379791E0.A6294617@apache.org> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 23:49:20 +0200 From: Stefano Mazzocchi Organization: Java Apache Project X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: Which Apache Version? References: <379787E7.9E58BB01@Eng.Sun.COM> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Anil K. Vijendran" wrote: > > Folks, > > A couple of us here are wondering what your thoughts are on the Apache > versions Jakarta/Tomcat should run on? I would target 1.3.6 (nothing less) for AJP-connection and 2.0 for native connection. This means: merge the existing JServ code and you're done in the short time. When Apache goes multithreaded, we might think of including the JVM inside the Apache process and move from there on. With Apache 1.3.x there is no choice but to follow the AJP model (unless you want to fire off a single JVM per process and you have gigas of RAM to throw away) -- Stefano Mazzocchi A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing. Alan J. Perlis ---------------------------------------------------------------------