tinkerpop-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From dkupp...@apache.org
Subject [37/50] tinkerpop git commit: Added some notes about certain Structure API bits for 4.x CTR
Date Wed, 07 Mar 2018 15:48:31 GMT
Added some notes about certain Structure API bits for 4.x CTR

Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/commit/512a4b8b
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/tree/512a4b8b
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/diff/512a4b8b

Branch: refs/heads/TINKERPOP-1522
Commit: 512a4b8b05fe036c828c3562bd72a50fc1b79e76
Parents: 62299a1
Author: Stephen Mallette <spmva@genoprime.com>
Authored: Mon Mar 5 19:42:34 2018 -0500
Committer: Stephen Mallette <spmva@genoprime.com>
Committed: Mon Mar 5 19:42:34 2018 -0500

 docs/src/dev/future/index.asciidoc | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/docs/src/dev/future/index.asciidoc b/docs/src/dev/future/index.asciidoc
index 4a51f57..d37f3e1 100644
--- a/docs/src/dev/future/index.asciidoc
+++ b/docs/src/dev/future/index.asciidoc
@@ -118,6 +118,14 @@ Distributed transactions are a challenge and don't apply to every provider.
 GLVs. The idea of local subgraphs for mutations and transaction management might be good
but that goes against having
 just `ReferenceGraph`.
+In "hiding blueprints" we should probably consider what relevance certain components of the
Structure API still have:
+* `io()` - this sorta fell short a few ways: API was a bit clunky, no integration with loading
via OLAP, etc.
+* `variables()` - one of the problems with variables is that they were not persisted by `io()`
which was generally a
+problem for TinkerGraph which relied on `io()` for flushing to file storage. This topic was
discussed a bit on
+* `tx()` - as discussed in the earlier paragraph
 == Gremlin Language Subset
 On link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1417[TINKERPOP-1417], it was suggested
that we "Create a

View raw message