Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tiles-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93399 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2009 08:55:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2009 08:55:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 70755 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2009 08:55:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tiles-users-archive@tiles.apache.org Received: (qmail 70693 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2009 08:55:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tiles.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@tiles.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@tiles.apache.org Received: (qmail 70679 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2009 08:55:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:55:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of antonio.petrelli@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.207 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.207] (HELO mail-fx0-f207.google.com) (209.85.220.207) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:55:42 +0000 Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so3229111fxm.8 for ; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:55:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=FhiFaf7rWFWXsnI5RJvFROpFixp227ftLvwebo4s5mQ=; b=gWCYCkPD9AiJ1KYAHBk2k6gYOj/e0RHZIoM8VhupEaVXo62F7Daqld7RJcSM7v9xoo fxUoC6B/ik5ZaBaRMi8jy76YPOBmC2/+ltP1JvKL/Wia8oQTeTzFCOmLZ+yC5YrG5kZg ZnovsZz2K9Nmht1r4a4rkFMarSz77ShAQP/EE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=sWI1JYAFCi2wuRbDIt5vIt1Q9M3qOvftGvRvFgzX93FfGdyH5KJ3loU8yOVkBI7xX3 cyxLa5GctssaCQE29MHXF7zK/iufWEAMlXqMpgbWN+JSMVaF3j+lp+LowWiqZEeDI6pw jWZ/LpCRFPbRzjnNVC/4EhY3JU8jJbc0YgzEY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.153.18 with SMTP id i18mr5350501bkw.123.1251795322118; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:55:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <851953ec0909010131y6d3cab4bj153ad010c2750269@mail.gmail.com> References: <25211797.post@talk.nabble.com> <851953ec0909010034r19804cf1n7b95b9f62ae20b57@mail.gmail.com> <851953ec0909010131y6d3cab4bj153ad010c2750269@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:55:22 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Classes extending junit testcase From: Antonio Petrelli To: users@tiles.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 2009/9/1 Roshni Basu : > I'm confused how to write unit testcases for class extending tiles tag. > Is only JUnit sufficient ? Probably yes, but you might want to take a look at Selenium: http://seleniumhq.org/ The Tiles test webapp uses it: http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/tiles/framework/trunk/tiles-test/ See: http://tiles.apache.org/framework/selenium.html Antonio