Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tiles-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30865 invoked from network); 4 May 2009 19:20:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 May 2009 19:20:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 39546 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2009 19:20:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tiles-users-archive@tiles.apache.org Received: (qmail 39526 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2009 19:20:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tiles.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@tiles.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@tiles.apache.org Received: (qmail 39516 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2009 19:20:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 May 2009 19:20:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of antonio.petrelli@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.213 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.213] (HELO mail-fx0-f213.google.com) (209.85.220.213) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 May 2009 19:19:57 +0000 Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so3982742fxm.8 for ; Mon, 04 May 2009 12:19:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y5H+BkPWb7NgXdm+zkxq4NGKKUia4zbcJQOqUPXEjmM=; b=q25OXmvf875z0RST/DNW6v5urLTKpnyyq91jITi/0I8tmFKNZBnvXhffNw53HGutJM QXY7HVs+sks9uXKt/1PEQGyFY63+WeK/ogtzIdqvYhviJM1s09iMe9jw/MrUtPuP6WeL kO97C4qTV+xkn3m1z8rqHbrvjBh7bGySRQSM0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=smdEywxyL4PD3s6pe6wJ/mGSlzxi1fIEtaRzdGsV52WgXzflfkncP5kQODc6F3+NVl jUhWynrDV0vepv8S3riC8ETlqlYn4+ga+fEUzmxIMe+Bp1oLwE4BMCrxbe91W8yL3AoS hMuCL4D0xTyTQZGp4r2m0iPC31CrqF4od8YE0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.117.194 with SMTP id s2mr2487091faq.83.1241464775412; Mon, 04 May 2009 12:19:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <39657.76143.qm@web39606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <39657.76143.qm@web39606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 21:19:35 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Support for reloading/refreshing Tile Definitions From: Antonio Petrelli To: users@tiles.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 2009/5/4 Vibhore Anant : > It is rather difficult for me to extract out my implementation as it is r= unning on a 3rd party app framework.=A0 Are there any other pointers you ca= n give me?=A0 It just seems to me that the param "org.apache.tiles.factory.= AbstractTilesContainerFactory" is taking no effect.=A0 Should I be creating= a custom LocaleDefinitionsFactory where I explicitly call the setDefinitio= nDAO() method with the DAO that I wrote? > > What is the best place for to start debugging the Tiles implementation my= self? I think that the culprit is TilesContainerFactory.postCreationOperations. In particular, did you set this parameter: org.apache.tiles.definition.DefinitionsFactory to your definitions factory implementation? Ciao Antonio