tiles-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Ryan <brett.r...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Bump Tiles to build with minimum JDK 1.8 ?
Date Wed, 06 Sep 2017 13:03:35 GMT
I still tend to disagree. Like the rise and fall of many new technologies, tiles is still my
go to for new web projects. It still handles templated composition better than any other facility
available. People confuse frontend technologies like angular as a replacement for tiles instead
of something to be complimented.

Tiles + knockoutjs will be my goto allowing modern frontend composition that's not locking
me in to anything.

It's my opinion tiles gained some popularity with spring/mvc, but since their direction has
been changing and not promoting tiles, unfortunately newcomers just don't get the exposure.

Again, my opinion, but spring (boot) is too concerned about creating a "standard" model without
any effort, tiles while requiring minimal configuration, still requires thought on the developers
part which is why they have lost favour of tiles.

> On 6 Sep 2017, at 22:16, Antonio Petrelli <antonio.petrelli@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2017-09-06 14:00 GMT+02:00 Brett Ryan <brett.ryan@gmail.com>:
>> I don't know anything about tiles usage metric, but I can only assume
>> users of tiles would look to use the it in new projects, not touch it in
>> existing or upgrade only if the maven version plugin told them a new one is
>> available.
> Well not exactly. I know that one case is not part of statistics, however
> we use Tiles (in a Spring environment) under Java 6.
> In fact the reality is exactly the opposite: Tiles is legacy. Tiles belongs
> to server-centric web development, a thing that was cool a decade ago.
> Tiles, as we know it, probably made its time. It works with old-style
> projects with old-style environments. And yes, my current development is
> old-style :-D
> Just my 2 cents
> Antonio

View raw message