tiles-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nathan Bubna <nbu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Migrating from Commons Logging to SLF4J
Date Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:28:20 GMT
License approval is done on the terms, not the name.  So, if SLF4j
uses a license with identical terms to MIT (and also plainly interpret
it that way), then i wouldn't pause on those grounds.

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Greg Reddin<gredbug@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Antonio
> Petrelli<antonio.petrelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello
>> I would like to know your thought about migrating from Commons Logging to SLF4j.
>
> What about the license? Their web page says the terms are "identical
> to those of the MIT License", then references approval by the ASF. I
> assume the approval is referring to the MIT license not this one. Is
> there any due diligence that should be done to assure there won't be
> problems with this?
>
> What is the motivation for the change? I don't have strong opinions
> one way or the other. Maybe I should be discussing on JIRA :-)
>
> Greg
>

Mime
View raw message