tiles-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nathan Bubna <nbu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Tiles 2.2.0
Date Thu, 14 May 2009 18:30:34 GMT
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> From: Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com>
>> Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
>> To: dev@tiles.apache.org
>> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 1:18 PM
>> --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Nathan Bubna <nbubna@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > From: Nathan Bubna <nbubna@gmail.com>
>> > Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
>> > To: dev@tiles.apache.org
>> > Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 1:10 PM
>> > I see no problem with anyone
>> > publishing snapshots.  If you have access
>> > to p.a.o and want to publish a snapshot there, go for
>> > it.  If you can
>> > only publish snapshots elsewhere, go for it.
>> Just
>> > don't call it
>> > "official" or a "release" or anything else of that
>> sort, as
>> > those must
>> > be voted on by the PMC.  But you already know
>> that.
>> > :)
>>
>> Hi Nathan.  Thanks for your input; I've been working
>> on building everything under the framework and have run into
>> a few snags.  First, I switched to the new Nexus
>> install for snapshots, because maven-site-plugin
>> 2.0-beta-8-SNAPSHOT wasn't at p.a.o snapshots... then, I
>> still couldn't get  2.0-beta-8-SNAPSHOT to work, so I
>> upgraded to 2.1-SNAPSHOT (this forced me to upgrade to mvn
>> 2.1.0).  Then the build kicked off.  Now I am
>> wrestling with the Velocity dependency; I may have to hit
>> those guys up for a blessing to publish a 1.7-SNAPSHOT as
>> well.
>>
>
> ...and (having perused committers.html) you are one of those guys.  ;)

Yep.  Same opinion applies there.  Publishing snapshots is limited
only by your ability to do so and what you can call it. :)  So, go for
it!

>> Thanks again,
>> Matt
>>
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > You know, this might be somewhat irregular, but
>> it
>> > looks like any member of the apcvs group on p.a.o can
>> > publish (legacy as opposed to Nexus) snapshots; I'd
>> be
>> > willing to make the attempt with the blessing of the
>> PMC.
>> > >
>> > > -Matt
>> > >
>> > > --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> From: Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com>
>> > >> Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
>> > >> To: dev@tiles.apache.org
>> > >> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 12:12 PM
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Greg Reddin <gredbug@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > From: Greg Reddin <gredbug@gmail.com>
>> > >> > Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
>> > >> > To: dev@tiles.apache.org
>> > >> > Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 11:07 AM
>> > >> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM,
>> > >> > Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com>
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > I see from the archives I just
>> managed
>> > to get
>> > >> on-list
>> > >> > right after Antonio left.  :)
>> Just my
>> > >> luck.  I am
>> > >> > interested in the native freemarker
>> support
>> > >> coming.  Is
>> > >> > there any chance 2.2.0 snapshots could
>> be
>> > >> published?  If
>> > >> > not I will build them locally.
>> Finally, has
>> > a
>> > >> timeframe
>> > >> > been established for 2.2.0 final?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Currently, there's no timeframe set for
>> > 2.2.0. Your
>> > >> best
>> > >> > bet right now
>> > >> > would be to build locally. I'd be
>> willing to
>> > publish
>> > >> a
>> > >> > release if it
>> > >> > *really* needs to happen and I can find
>> all
>> > the
>> > >> needed
>> > >> > steps to make
>> > >> > it happen.
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >> Well, assuming I can get the whole framework
>> built
>> > and
>> > >> published to my local Nexus repo I can get by
>> that
>> > way for
>> > >> quite some time before I personally need a
>> > release.
>> > >> Thanks.
>> > >>
>> > >> -Matt
>> > >>
>> > >> > Greg
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message