Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tiles-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 12835 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 07:18:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 07:18:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 28606 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2007 07:18:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tiles-dev-archive@tiles.apache.org Received: (qmail 28571 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2007 07:18:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tiles.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@tiles.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tiles.apache.org Received: (qmail 28562 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2007 07:18:09 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:18:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of antonio.petrelli@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.179] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:18:04 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a25so3341078pyi for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:17:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=FaJby8YXTHXNWAc7WWTcXbp0WkjorzUJMj0G8keN0IxRgBAL8AGh7oCjj7kqYDbbi6iVEmszB04CD2L9W2Mm83wMzFr9CLATcx+VursxZNX09JiG7V3B/CedzsEdMeLUbvjE/OBLXy12vprMucYyX88aJ+pEFTR16C5enalf8DM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=WABwfu0wO8k5YajZEDjDCFNi53WCMAt+k9zrypAgus6t1GVB5wWqHzdSR3tliH1gAucd9WXqP9bB/F1SltSwwCu6kItNuAL4ofK2i5emz4sO/hAw1suvZGLamCw7D8NSfwQ5W4bdwqspGcIMmk7b0JdHMsHkyxV46rxI7JklXZI= Received: by 10.35.63.2 with SMTP id q2mr7756247pyk.1180941458653; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:17:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.28.7 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 00:17:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:17:38 +0200 From: "Antonio Petrelli" To: dev@tiles.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] 2.0.4 Release Quality In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_22724_4080418.1180941458467" References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_22724_4080418.1180941458467 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, I am back again :-) 2007/6/4, Wendy Smoak : > > +1 for Beta quality based on Antonio and Greg's opinion. Wendy, I think it is dangerous to vote with others opinion as a basis. License and notice files are in place (tiles-core and tiles-jsp jars > have duplicates). Duplicates have been resolved, and they will disappear in 2.0.5 The example app works for me in Tomcat 5.5.17. I > think the webapp's NOTICE file should include something for JSTL 1.1. Mmm it seems like a blocking issue, isn't it? By the way, what is the license for JSTL? Antonio ------=_Part_22724_4080418.1180941458467--