tiles-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nathan Bubna" <nbu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Missing License headers in 2.0.2 release
Date Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:16:27 GMT
On 3/30/07, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/30/07, Antonio Petrelli <antonio.petrelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I solved some problems that I noticed only during the release of
> > 2.0.2. From my POV the "new tag" approach is the best (I am making the
> > release, so it is in my interest :-) ) but I am open to comments.
>
> +1 for moving to 2.0.3.
>
> Tiles 2.0.2 exists now, there's a tag and jars have been deployed to a
> staging repository [1].

i don't find tags difficult to change, but if there are jars out
there, then yes, +1 for moving to 2.0.3.  i don't mind "holes" in the
sequence at all.

> I don't like the practice of re-tagging over and over, there's too
> much chance of "different" versions of 2.0.2 escaping into the wild,
> which could make user support difficult.  (Which 2.0.2 are you using?)
>
> Skipping a version number is a non-issue to me... it happens at Tomcat
> and no one even blinks.
>
> [1] When you stage the release, please move 'm2-staging-repository'
> out of the way, for example to
> people.a.o/builds/tiles/2.0.2/m2-staging-repository.  Where it is now,
> you risk mixing two staged versions if you forget to clear it out.  In
> this case, just delete it because 2.0.2 isn't going anywhere.
>
> --
> Wendy
>

Mime
View raw message