From dev-return-54452-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@thrift.apache.org Wed Jan 2 22:11:39 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D27E180662 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 22:11:39 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 24996 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2019 21:11:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@thrift.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@thrift.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@thrift.apache.org Received: (qmail 24979 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2019 21:11:37 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 21:11:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5E6EDC080F for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 21:11:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.798 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.798 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id okTIzXtCUPh8 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 21:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi1-f196.google.com (mail-oi1-f196.google.com [209.85.167.196]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id EEB775F47B for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 21:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi1-f196.google.com with SMTP id i6so26137084oia.6 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 13:11:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=P9F0fTgOq1vEnCqgrf6/FlYyZSbSME0ckO4ZkR5ChhU=; b=KxibLng9UMQb2eY+VBEfF/eu8jmLdaXkLHZW6uOMx4kB6a3408YEUQ36rDE+vN9Fyu E72Zu0Bdrm2xBt3qR+hK0PYzjvNMfYBjY7UZXd+45/I6t5QNTuN/lOp6YeEs/VjTlpQ7 zJIAeaU/WHFwgS99VF5ChbR+CqmkrU+mIemMGhvV3KTGqrldcOTcfwnvpVfOU77cgQDb +XZmdevv4p7JAJZhK9k4DVzXr39mUmQ5CZuHWiDtt/tqOvOSMMWUE8N4u3lwb25/FCIW WZWN/3rAAl6LWYlLHpQZseq9lNOtQKN9U/3abrSZB87FGsD0C7uZ+hqt85Yt7dnopTid 57gg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=P9F0fTgOq1vEnCqgrf6/FlYyZSbSME0ckO4ZkR5ChhU=; b=dnOyEMvRMByVgNPfk3QBEa6G2X74+tE/k+SACoix3G/sQWuWFRiY6Pe/2rBZkAlr+2 DLmLhBBjH53czMZv/CBjzMKSzXz2zlSsb1+j5j+nK8eMoqnDV9sjDHqWp9QP71AmFBd3 zKokTsqx3XfoeAvmSQqltJQm9/ih5ivde/VfpKxFF/PFM9qJpYvRRiczL+/8cffnpicb TCiAlddJ2gHBVwgkJhs/Upc9gWVl4HBlpcoHToJUbirwJ9ESxHYSvFepVXL0/F40qAIW lrPj26W2VHsRLCGulGRVKvfezWtBqULMOMfTMxVnfnp94Im30gM9HO0sn4X+RJFjkwhT l4wQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbTilV/JJSEOPCLvR79wOrkix7sEa/DrHhmAW3btYNU0qyRmHZi tvX3voG09mYyxgOEqIu5aDw1FIBXGyhoDcu5SVxalQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/W/Dsrztyvq20d4QD4FgO+ukW5Xwbglkw6nnGtyWoVP+xSOqd8tePtaLDprSuaT50iFqGUWh3OifvSyX7Lq7l4= X-Received: by 2002:aca:368a:: with SMTP id d132mr31626400oia.193.1546463487641; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 13:11:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 13:11:27 -0800 From: Allen George In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 13:11:27 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Support for lib/csharp .NET Framework before 4.5? To: dev@thrift.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d6cee8057e8016ea" --000000000000d6cee8057e8016ea Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable So, just to be clear, proposed language removals are: Approved: Cocoa C++03 or less Open: JavaME (potential; I=E2=80=99ll look at setting up an Android CI environmen= t and using the standard Java lib there to see if it=E2=80=99s feasible) .net 4.5 or less (no vote yet) Silverlight One of nodets/ts (can we end up only with one, or are there legitimate differences between the two was the question) Allen On January 2, 2019 at 15:55:41, Jens Geyer (jensgeyer@hotmail.com) wrote: Hi, start a vote. A while ago some people claimed that 4.5+ was not available on their particular subset of Mono. I tend to think that this is no longer the case anymore, so we should drop anything below 4.5. And since wer'e at it: Same for Silverlight, if you ask me. It is still supported until 2012 by Microsoft, but I doubt if anyone really uses it except for maintaining legacy projects. Maybe we should have a vote about that too. Have fun, JensG -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Nachricht----- From: James E. King III Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 9:08 PM To: dev@thrift.apache.org Subject: Re: Support for lib/csharp .NET Framework before 4.5? We already support netstandard2.0 (.NET Core SDK 2.0) and build lib/netcore and run cross tests with that. The docker build image (build/docker/ubuntu-bionic/Dockerfile) defines the version we build against. I was wondering about the .NET 3.5 in lib/csharp and whether we really need a 3.5 and a 4.5 csproj. It's not a big deal really, just a small simplification, but if a lot of people are still on .NET 3.5 then we may decide not to remove support for it yet. - Jim On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 12:55 PM Randy Abernethy wrote: > While we're in the process of dropping old lang vers, I think we > should consider only tracking the latest version of .Net Core (2.2). > Core is CLI build friendly and cross platform. The .Net Framework can > run all Core apps AFAIK so no loss in dropping the Framework for > forward looking stuff. > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 6:24 AM James E. King III wrote: > > > > We currently have two projects to support.NET 3.5 and .NET 4.5. The > > differences are minor but it causes us to have to build two projects. > > Do > > we need to continue to maintain support for .NET < 4.5 ? > > > > - Jim > > > > -- > > -- > Randy Abernethy > Managing Partner > RX-M, LLC > randy.abernethy@rx-m.com > o 415-800-2922 > c 415-624-6447 > --000000000000d6cee8057e8016ea--