thrift-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chet Murthy <>
Subject Re: Thrift unions don't work as documented
Date Sat, 02 Dec 2017 18:52:14 GMT
I should have said that there were changes, but nothing that looked linear
in the number of fields.  But like I said, I no longer know any relevant
assembly languages ....

On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Chet Murthy <> wrote:

> [Just out of curiousity, I wrote a program with 64 bit fields, and looked
> at the assembler.  Then I reduced it to 20 fields, and compared.  Just to
> see if there was a difference in size (which there would have to be, if
> there was anything related to # of fields, affecting code.  No change.
> Sadly, the last assembler I knew was VAX, so I couldn't actually understand
> the assembler ... <sigh>]

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message