[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gopal V updated TEZ-3974: ------------------------- Attachment: TEZ-3974.3.patch > Tez: Correctness regression of TEZ-955 in TEZ-2937 > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: TEZ-3974 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3974 > Project: Apache Tez > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Gopal V > Assignee: Gopal V > Priority: Critical > Attachments: TEZ-3974.1.patch, TEZ-3974.2.patch, TEZ-3974.3.patch > > > TEZ-2937 might have introduced a race condition for Tez output events, along with TEZ-2237 > {code} > // Close the Outputs. > for (OutputSpec outputSpec : outputSpecs) { > String destVertexName = outputSpec.getDestinationVertexName(); > initializedOutputs.remove(destVertexName); > List closeOutputEvents = ((LogicalOutputFrameworkInterface)outputsMap.get(destVertexName)).close(); > sendTaskGeneratedEvents(closeOutputEvents, > EventProducerConsumerType.OUTPUT, taskSpec.getVertexName(), > destVertexName, taskSpec.getTaskAttemptID()); > } > // Close the Processor. > processorClosed = true; > processor.close(); > {code} > As part of TEZ-2237, the outputs send empty events when the output is closed without being started (which happens in task init failures). > These events are obsoleted when a task fails and this happens in the AM, but not before the dispatcher looks at them. > Depending on the timing, the empty events can escape obsoletion & be sent to a downstream task. > This gets marked as a SKIPPED event in the downstream task, which means that further obsoletion events sent to the downstream task is ignored (because a zero byte fetch is not repeated on node failure). > So the downstream task can exit without actually waiting for the retry of the failed task and cause silent dataloss in case where the retry succeeds in another attempt. > So if processor.close() throws an exception, this introduce a race condition and if the AM is too fast, we end up with correctness issues. > This was originally reported in TEZ-955 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)