tez-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kostas Tzoumas (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (TEZ-1638) Missing type parametrization in UnorderedKVInputConfig?
Date Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:00:58 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-1638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14181354#comment-14181354
] 

Kostas Tzoumas commented on TEZ-1638:
-------------------------------------

Hi, I uploaded a patch for the UnorderedKVInputConfig. I can change the rest of the configs
as well. When is 0.5.2 planned for? Is there any configs other than OrderedGroupedKVInputConfig
missing this?




> Missing type parametrization in UnorderedKVInputConfig? 
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEZ-1638
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-1638
>             Project: Apache Tez
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Kostas Tzoumas
>            Assignee: Kostas Tzoumas
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: tez1638.patch
>
>
> In UnorderedInputConfig (https://github.com/apache/tez/blob/master/tez-runtime-library/src/main/java/org/apache/tez/runtime/library/conf/UnorderedKVInputConfig.java)
some methods of SpecificBuilder have a parameterized return type (SpecificBuilder<E>)
and some a non-parameterized return type (SpecificBuilder).
> Shouldn't all methods return the parameterized version? 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message