Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tcl-websh-dev-archive@tcl.apache.org Received: (qmail 33495 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2002 15:37:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact websh-dev-help@tcl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list websh-dev@tcl.apache.org Received: (qmail 33480 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2002 15:37:18 -0000 Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:37:16 +0100 From: Ronnie Brunner To: "David N. Welton" Cc: websh-dev@tcl.apache.org Subject: Re: logToAp vs. interpool Message-ID: <20020306163716.C18109@netcetera.ch> Reply-To: Ronnie Brunner References: <87y9h67x2y.fsf@dedasys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <87y9h67x2y.fsf@dedasys.com>; from davidw@dedasys.com on Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 12:30:13PM +0100 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > logToAp looks to be a pain, if one wants to add more information. Is > it ok if we just log straight to Apache? That would greatly > facilitate a couple of the fixme's in this file. I checked in an extended version of logToAp: it just takes additional arguments that format the msg string. Doesn't that help? logToAp(interp, NULL, "hello %s", "World"); Ronnie ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ronnie Brunner ronnie.brunner@netcetera.ch Netcetera AG, 8040 Zuerich phone +41 1 247 79 79 Fax: +41 1 247 70 75 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: websh-dev-unsubscribe@tcl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: websh-dev-help@tcl.apache.org