taverna-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Server License status
Date Fri, 05 Jan 2018 16:27:25 GMT
On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 00:34:24 +0000, "Donal K. Fellows" <donal.k.fellows@manchester.ac.uk>
wrote:
> word processor things). If there's an updated version (GFD.204?) that 
> maps to a schema that is a schema-correct document itself, you could try 
> updating to point at that. Indeed, that would be preferable *even 

Yes, I had a look at that (see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAVERNA-1026) - although that
seems to imply a bit more changes elsewhere - although I think we can do
most of the fixes within the JobUs. 

Compare the old 
http://taverna.staging.apache.org/javadoc/taverna-server/org/apache/taverna/server/usagerecord/xml/urf/package-summary.html

against the new
http://taverna.staging.apache.org/javadoc/taverna-server/org/apache/taverna/server/usagerecord/xml/urf2/package-summary.html

> > Not sure why GFD.204's XSD is not on the web, but I
> > guess we could also try to copy that out from the PDF.
> If you do copy out of it, really do check that the resulting schema 
> document is valid in itself. ;-)

Luckily it was 100% valid according to both Eclipse's XSD editor
and JAXB XJC :)



> Also ping the OGF guys to ask them if there's a particular reason the 
> schema isn't direct downloadable. That would seem like an odd omission 
> to make, and the schema link should be discoverable. The link that is 
> presented (non-normatively, i.e., in an example only) within GFD.204 is 
> http://schema.ogf.org/urf/2013/04/urf but that is non-resolvable. It all 
> looks like a technical slip-up on the OGF's part.

Good point.

I've emailed https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ur-wg
and operations@ogf.org

-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes
The University of Manchester
http://www.esciencelab.org.uk/
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718


Mime
View raw message