taverna-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gale Naylor <Ga...@noventussolutions.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating RC2
Date Thu, 02 Jun 2016 01:16:38 GMT
Starting the review process...

The MD5 checksums in the [VOTE] email are the same as the SHA1 checksums.
I'm using the downloaded MD5 and SHA-1.

(Question) I'm curious what r13865 means:

I didn't see the commit ID in the [VOTE] email. Did I miss it?

LICENSES - THIRD-PARTY.properties file

The list of # Already used licenses in project : includes

# - GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1
Isn't this a category-x license? (It doesn't show up in the
"Please fill in the missing licenses" list.)

Missing licenses:
# http://x-stream.github.io/license.html - this link says BSD (but not
which type);
should this copyright be included in our Notice file?

org.aopalliance--com.springsource.org.aopalliance--1.0.0  - no license

# https://github.com/hunterhacker/jdom/blob/jdom-1.1/core/LICENSE.txt  -
this link has a copyright;
include in Notice file? What do we use for "type" of license? "Copyright?"
Or is this also a "JDOM License" like

# http://www.xmlpull.org/  - no license listed

Category B licenses?
Aren't these listed under category-b, binary release only? Or do they meet
the exception
for allowing in a source release? ("For small amounts of source that is
consumed by the ASF product at runtime in source form, and for which that
source is unmodified and unlikely to be changed ...")

javax.transaction--com.springsource.javax.transaction--1.1.0 - CDDL 1.0

org.aspectj--com.springsource.org.aspectj.runtime--1.6.0 - Eclipse Public
License 1.0
org.aspectj--com.springsource.org.aspectj.weaver--1.6.0 - Eclipse Public
License 1.0

That's as far as I can get today. Will do the rest of the review tomorrow.


On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:18 AM Stian Soiland-Reyes <stain@apache.org> wrote:

> On 1 June 2016 at 12:01, Stian Soiland-Reyes <stain@apache.org> wrote:
> > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
> >
> >   Apache Taverna Engine 3.1.0-incubating
> >   Apache Taverna Common Activities 2.1.0-incubating
> >   Apache Taverna Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating
> > ..
> > Build the release candidate *in the above order*, using:
> Sorry I mixed up the order in the checksums which were immediately
> above in this vote email - to clarify the build order is:
> taverna-engine
> taverna-common-activities
> taverna-commandline
> The reason is that command line depends on common-activities, which
> depend on taverna-engine, all in the same version as being released.
> Perhaps for the next vote emails I will include the full URIs to the
> folders rather than just ../rc2/
> --
> Stian Soiland-Reyes
> Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons
> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message