taverna-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Dunlop <ian.dun...@manchester.ac.uk>
Subject Common workflow language
Date Fri, 04 Dec 2015 15:28:05 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hello,

Does anyone have views on how Apache Taverna fits into the goals of
the Common Workflow Language project
https://github.com/common-workflow-language/common-workflow-language ?
Should taverna adopt CWL instead of SCUFL2. Are there things that
SCUFL2 or the current taverna engine offers that CWL does not?

Cheers,

Ian
- -- 
Ian Dunlop, eScience Lab
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7066-3350
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWYbEFAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy591cH/0VIbw0yKnqkQiIca9bFcsIn
fCN+KAtD4UC0l2rtynXsXSzr98Vp8/iisuLNUXAw+BO0Xc4oXBmU6QtgDfYnv/tB
MI/0MlR/ugI3T8LNPn/MODQZYlAPHzIEX5zjNNVCpT3oQXCkGTwMglXtsEWKcx4t
uf6MQJsoE/zvFVjslY3vKWw3IJS7iyIWuGl4caG/lUEUdiQFRRq57e/WFM+IoPqG
jE6UO3JUmZJw/GVBJqkkoqs4p5EdTArGWz3/qICkl1UkUEEqgtHjlJO9APl5Szfv
9X6n1SV5BcmH0XXd1YIHBW+s6pSCKbxRjOhPURSN+FTmMYSM0kXzeD9c2MnzhGU=
=Agk2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message