Mailing-List: contact users-help@tapestry.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tapestry users" <users@tapestry.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of thiagohp@gmail.com designates
 209.85.213.52 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
To: "Tapestry users" <users@tapestry.apache.org>, "Bob Harner"
 <bobharner@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [T5.3] Wot No Component Reference?
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 22:02:03 -0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
From: "Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo" <thiagohp@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <op.v4cfppse18r83n@lhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.52 (Linux)

On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:55:31 -0200, Bob Harner <bobharner@gmail.com> wro=
te:

> There are currently two candidates to directly replace the old
> Component Reference:
>
> 1) The Javadoc version (nice and compact):
> http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/coreli=
b/components/package-summary.html
>
> 2) Categorized and manually maintained:
> http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html
>
> What do you all think is the best one to link to? I suppose each
> serves a purpose.

I'd link both, or at least make the package summary link to the  =

caregorized one and vice-versa.

-- =

Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer,=
  =

and instructor
Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informa=C3=A7=C3=A3o Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org