Mailing-List: contact users-help@tapestry.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tapestry users" <users@tapestry.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of hlship@gmail.com designates
 66.249.92.169 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=bcDBfrncghMxLEV305xGVe1ahk7HVQlHX4mVAX5QjONzr9YCJI+dLAP0+YDv0vEtnwu3QBtI59FbduVyCdsynd7RxFjYNGAtQCqt/hLRVNvw0PaAXFNpZMtq8vz7Ue1R8D73hLDQ449pAUM6UVZZZnRWhQrN1Us37ucsgYrWlgU=
Message-ID: <ecd0e3310703011448t60bbe29aq1491921cc10e2bfe@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:48:33 -0800
From: "Howard Lewis Ship" <hlship@gmail.com>
To: "Tapestry users" <users@tapestry.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Latest Tapestry 5 Screencast
In-Reply-To: <a6647e120703011226j72c7fd8cn2faa7112bc5786a2@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <ecd0e3310702282140v2b4e8dd2u8c1a076b5244e091@mail.gmail.com>
	 <a6647e120703011226j72c7fd8cn2faa7112bc5786a2@mail.gmail.com>

For the moment, yes; you would obtain the bean model, and then remove
the properties you don't want to display.  I believe BeanEditForm and
Grid should both provide parmeters to make this easier (i.e.,
excludeProperties="trackId,genre" ).

D&J's BeanEditor component has excludeProperties and includeProperties
and eventually T5 will catch up.

Annotations are one of those very divisive areas; somepeople are
positively allergic to them, see them as the scourge.  I generally
find annotations pretty harmeless, so (where reasonable) adding a
@NonVisual annotation is not a big issue for me.  Sometimes, the bean
in question is out of your control, and you don't have the ability to
annotate it (or maybe a property is visible to some users and not to
others), and that's where you need a higher-level approach.

On 3/1/07, Massimo Lusetti <mlusetti@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/1/07, Howard Lewis Ship <hlship@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This one shows off the new Grid component.
>
> Amazing work Howard i got just one question.
> you said one approach to mark a field as hidden is to use the
> NonVisual annotation but i don't like the idea of annotating my domain
> data objects so i guess i've to use the BeanModel facility, am i
> right?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Massimo
> http://meridio.blogspot.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship
TWD Consulting, Inc.
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry
Creator, Apache HiveMind

Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org