Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tapestry-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tapestry-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F92111648 for ; Tue, 20 May 2014 09:17:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55948 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2014 09:17:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tapestry-dev-archive@tapestry.apache.org Received: (qmail 55917 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2014 09:17:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tapestry.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tapestry development" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tapestry.apache.org Received: (qmail 55909 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2014 09:17:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 May 2014 09:17:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [5.9.235.118] (HELO beta.zimbra-services.com) (5.9.235.118) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 May 2014 09:17:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by beta.zimbra-services.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CC841A00D for ; Tue, 20 May 2014 11:17:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from beta.zimbra-services.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (beta.zimbra-services.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 39ZQTKUdA6Qe for ; Tue, 20 May 2014 11:17:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by beta.zimbra-services.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40CB41A013 for ; Tue, 20 May 2014 11:17:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at beta.zimbra-services.com Received: from beta.zimbra-services.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (beta.zimbra-services.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id NMo3bwiLr0ox for ; Tue, 20 May 2014 11:17:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.10.23] (unknown [80.157.168.50]) by beta.zimbra-services.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFC6E41A00D for ; Tue, 20 May 2014 11:17:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <537B1D9B.9090407@eddyson.de> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 11:17:15 +0200 From: Jochen Kemnade User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tapestry development Subject: Re: TAP5-1213: Changes to public API References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Am 20.05.2014 08:23, schrieb Lance Java: > I agree but thought I was in the minority. > > The extra interfaces have increased the complexity and require third > parties to know about the nuances of the implementation. Adding methods to > the public API may cause compilation errors (in rare cases) but at least > it's clear. > > Anyone else have an opinion? Unfortunately, I haven't had the chance to look at the changes too closely yet, so I'm not sure if this is relevant at all. But wouldn't adding methods to the existing interfaces lead to libraries written for (and compiled against) Tapestry 5.3 would not work with Tapestry 5.4 anymore? Jochen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org