tapestry-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Igor Drobiazko <igor.drobia...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Thought experiment: shared pages/components
Date Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:08:11 GMT
I agree with Thiago that the suggested feature is a nice to have and should
be on the roadmap. The migration from Javassist doesn't provide a direct
added value to the users and I think Tapestry would profit more if you would
spend your time in other areas. Do we really need this feature is 5.2
release? I think there are some more important things to do. For example we
still don't have a solution for the asset protection, two releases have been

Another thing is the integration of JEE6 specs. I believe it is
strategically important to label Tapestry as "JEE 6 compliant" framework.
There are still too much developers who care about the standards.

Just my 2 cents.

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <
thiagohp@gmail.com> wrote:

> I suggest putting this suggestion in the roadmap for some not yet defined
> future Tapestry releas

Best regards,

Igor Drobiazko

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message