tapestry-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Zeigler <robe...@scazdl.org>
Subject stax template parser and column
Date Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:28:07 GMT
In StaxTemplateParser.getLocation, is the call to the  
LocationImpl(Resource, int) constructor, as opposed to the  
LocationImpl(Resource, int, int) constructor, deliberate (ie: are we  
no longer bothering with tracking the column information)? I ask only  
because there are integration tests that test for the presence of  
column information.  These tests were passing before only because of  
an apparent bug in "assertTextPresent" whereby only the first element  
of the varag parameter was examined (a return statement should have  
been continue).
I just need to know whether to fix the tests or the code.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org

View raw message