tapestry-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alfie Kirkpatrick (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (TAP5-619) Provide way to override PropertyEditor.beanBlockSource
Date Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:26:13 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12695363#action_12695363

Alfie Kirkpatrick commented on TAP5-619:

Hi Thiago, I take your points but just for the record, while BeanBlockSource can be overridden,
currently the same service is injected in all cases. I want to specify a particular BeanBlockSource
instance for a particular PropertyEditor in my page. PropertyEditor is not classed as 'internal'
so I don't see a problem in principle with this as a wishlist item...

> Provide way to override PropertyEditor.beanBlockSource
> ------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: TAP5-619
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-619
>             Project: Tapestry 5
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: tapestry-core
>    Affects Versions:
>            Reporter: Alfie Kirkpatrick
>            Priority: Minor
> I am building a search form and would like to override the default edit blocks with search-style
ones. This is conjunction with a HashMap<String, Object> backed bean model. As an example,
for dates I want to have a date range block which sends back a start/end range for a date,
possibly as a DateRangeSearchTerm against the property name in the hashmap. The search implementation
will then know how to convert this into a query to the backend.
> I might be pushing the whole BeanEditModel/Conduit framework further than intended? However,
doing it this way provides some nice ways to override an auto-built form, eg. by restricting/reordering
the properties or by overriding specific blocks even further.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message