Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tajo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@tajo.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM=XDd_xkcN2EfQn8LrtfSMOeW36TRKNMxdwYtqMaddL2WF2Bg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH=F5dnCErKhwDVoa0M3iVuvX3UdvyixRF6LbeCbMCpMPErQ1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACZfFK5deP-17uKvekyvS2_JjVjo_vazf6CAtVFbM-nq81vwHg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJWPb4L3Cq+LgC_0bHYw6e9gS1oj1cnjE_18DpvdwbaaGD+xcQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJWPb4+h05KPYzF3MHF-XTp=vhb6eVoxA6yW8TpXo73ne5dw5Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM=XDd_fzjGA_HCXA9mM0rFJx7aBtrwXpKw_zF5m4mo-ROHZcQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM=XDd_qmODrBOvKHzOR-UYLJ3Na2swX7cNqewnMzooDgjTCWw@mail.gmail.com> <D0CBD898-9801-42B5-82F7-A8651331B0AE@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D0CBD898-9801-42B5-82F7-A8651331B0AE@gmail.com>
From: Jong-young Park <eminency@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:57:33 +0000
Message-ID: <CAGvFKvQq9pANuAZP8CzMMTHVeHXTOCkmwOVkdMb5WbmwXkYk9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] 0.12 release
To: dev@tajo.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113fcf1c0c0c07055f1f852d"
archived-at: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:57:51 -0000

--001a113fcf1c0c0c07055f1f852d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm glad to hear that.

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 4:28 PM =EA=B9=80 =EC=A7=84=ED=98=B8 <jinossy@gmail=
.com> wrote:

> Thank you for your efforts
>
> - Jinho
>
> > On 27 Nov 2017, at 09:47, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I'm going to move forward 0.12 release. I just looked into our progress
> > about 0.12 in Jira. 239 issues are already resolved in 0.12, 11 are in
> > progress, 58 are scheduled yet are not started. As we discussed early, =
we
> > can reschedule not critical issues to next release.
> >
> > To prepare 0.12 release, I've just created 'branch-0.12.0' from the
> current
> > master.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Hyunsik Choi
> >
> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:22 PM Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik.choi@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> If you guys were doing issues scheduled to 0.12, please change fix
> >> versions.
> >>
> >> Dongjin,
> >> Sure. You can freely change the schedule.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Hyunsik
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:21 AM Dongjin Lee <dongjin.lee.kr@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Add to this, it seems like TAJO-1724[^1] and TAJO-1951[^2] was
> originally
> >>> aimed to be fixed in 0.12.0 but still not on progress. Could you chan=
ge
> >>> their (expected) fix version to later one? And if there is anyone who
> is
> >>> working on those issues, I would like to take them.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Dongjin
> >>>
> >>> [^1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1724
> >>> [^2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1951
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Dongjin Lee <
> dongjin.lee.kr@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1. No Problems.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Dongjin
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Jihoon Son <jihoonson@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1, I agree with you.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best,
> >>>>> Jihoon
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2016=EB=85=84 9=EC=9B=94 13=EC=9D=BC (=ED=99=94) =EC=98=A4=ED=9B=84=
 2:02, Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org>=EB=8B=98=EC=9D=B4 =EC=9E=91=EC=84=B1:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Hyunsik,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We don=E2=80=99t have blocker issue. So I agree with 0.12 release
> >>>>>> It=E2=80=99s very useful to users, I think.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -Jinho
> >>>>>> Best regards
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2016-09-12 18:14 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi guys,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 0.12 release is being delayed because we haven't finish some issu=
es
> >>>>>>> scheduled to 0.12. There are many demands on 0.12 release. The ma=
in
> >>>>>> reason
> >>>>>>> is much different code base between master and 0.11.x. Some users
> >>> and
> >>>>>>> developers want to fix bugs in 0.11.x as well as in master branch=
.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think it's time to release 0.12 release with the current branch
> >>> and
> >>>>>> some
> >>>>>>> critical remain issues.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> My question is two:
> >>>>>>> * What do you think about it?
> >>>>>>> * If we agree with 0.12. release, what issues must be included in
> >>>>> this
> >>>>>>> release?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm looking forward to your opinions.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>> Hyunsik
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> *Dongjin Lee*
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> *Software developer in Line+.So interested in massive-scale machine
> >>>> learning.facebook: www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr
> >>>> <http://www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr>linkedin:
> >>>> kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
> >>>> <http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>github:
> >>>> <http://goog_969573159>github.com/dongjinleekr
> >>>> <http://github.com/dongjinleekr>twitter: www.twitter.com/dongjinleek=
r
> >>>> <http://www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr>*
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> *Dongjin Lee*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *Software developer in Line+.So interested in massive-scale machine
> >>> learning.facebook: www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr
> >>> <http://www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr>linkedin:
> >>> kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
> >>> <http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>github:
> >>> <http://goog_969573159>github.com/dongjinleekr
> >>> <http://github.com/dongjinleekr>twitter: www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr
> >>> <http://www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr>*
> >>>
> >>
>

--001a113fcf1c0c0c07055f1f852d--