Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tajo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tajo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FA4918E55 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29521 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2015 23:50:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tajo-dev-archive@tajo.apache.org Received: (qmail 29481 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2015 23:50:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tajo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@tajo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tajo.apache.org Received: (qmail 29471 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2015 23:50:43 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:50:43 +0000 Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com (mail-oi0-f50.google.com [209.85.218.50]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 4BF591A0323 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oiab3 with SMTP id b3so17470172oia.1 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:50:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.60.173.7 with SMTP id bg7mr938674oec.86.1436917842345; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:50:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jihoon Son Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:50:32 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: branch creation for 0.11 To: dev@tajo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd7678890870a051ade81e4 --047d7bd7678890870a051ade81e4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1! 2015=EB=85=84 7=EC=9B=94 14=EC=9D=BC (=ED=99=94) =EC=98=A4=ED=9B=84 4:13, J= aehwa Jung =EB=8B=98=EC=9D=B4 =EC=9E=91=EC=84=B1: > +1 LGTM! :-) > > 2015-07-14 15:46 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi : > > > Hi guys, > > > > We have done most of main issues for 0.11 release. I propose the > > branch creation for 0.11 and the development of 0.12 roadmaps in > > master branch. This is not about feature freeze of 0.11 because there > > remain still few feature issues. How do you think about that? > > > > Best regards, > > Hyunsik > > > --047d7bd7678890870a051ade81e4--