Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tajo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@tajo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of azuryyyu@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.172 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAM=XDd804-rSMvvKt8OyaVi=boMvoqDAxRqWytHqZPuSA10w9g@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAM=XDd804-rSMvvKt8OyaVi=boMvoqDAxRqWytHqZPuSA10w9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:19:49 +0800
Message-ID: 
 <CALr1C9r2xkFJze-ZMip_Fy8WW4iOvqKXfR4Bb1OjvZ7ywEGgtw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Beyond 0.10.0 release
From: Azuryy Yu <azuryyyu@gmail.com>
To: "dev@tajo.apache.org" <dev@tajo.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147ebda53f2f6051171c385

--001a1147ebda53f2f6051171c385
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Thanks Hyunsik,

I will look through these features and hope can do something in future.

IMO, if Tajo supports multi-tenants and security, then we are truely better
than Impala according to my performance testing.


On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> In order to share milestones with you guys and concentrate our effort
> on the next release, we need to discuss the next roadmap.
> Particularly, I'd like to share our direction with new contributors
> due to the growing number of contributors.
>
> As far as I know, the following major issues seem to be resolved in time.
>
> * Nested complex type (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-721)
> * in subquery (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-680)
> * Resource allocation should be fine grained (TAJO-1397)
> * ALTER TABLE ADD/DROP PARTITION statement (TAJO-744)
> * Python UDF (TAJO-1344)
>
> The above issues probably can be included in 0.11 release. If there
> are missed issues, please let me know them.
>
>
> Besides, the following feature issues may be on our roadmap:
>
> * Multi-tenancy query scheduler (TAJO-540)
> * More SQL features (scalar subquery, ...)
>   * Decimal type support
>   * Scalar subquery
> * OLAP features (rollup, drill down, cube, ..)
> * More rewrite rules (lots of issues like Unnesting of Nested Subqueries,
> ...)
> * Make storage handler more pluggable
> * Better failure handling of tasks and nodes (TAJO-1214)
> * CREATE FUNCTION statement support
> * CREATE TYPE statement support
> * ....
>
> Most of them are not assigned as far as I know. In addition, there are
> many performance issues. I'll describe them later.
>
> Anyway, I would be pleasure if we task about what issues you are
> considering for 0.11 release or after that. I'm looking forward to
> hearing you guys' feedback.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Hyunsik
>

--001a1147ebda53f2f6051171c385--