tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hyunsik Choi <hyun...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Beyond 0.10.0 release
Date Thu, 19 Mar 2015 21:48:35 GMT
If there are no further discussion, I'll update the Roadmap page in wiki.

- hyunsik

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org> wrote:
> Absolutely!
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> It sounds good to me.
>>
>> Also remember 'if it doesn't happen on the mailing list, it doesn't
>> happen at Apache'. Please read the below mailing list thread, saying
>> what we must keep.
>>
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCAJwFCa0CfjFGq5NcG7GNSPEZjg1hvy3NO-5_KfPd2ZXvc-SHKg@mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Hyunsik
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Today we have a Tajo regional meetup in Seoul. What about discussing this
>> > issue in detail there?
>> >
>> > Of course, we should post the result here, too.
>> >
>> > Warmly,
>> > Dongjoon
>> >
>> > On Tuesday, March 17, 2015, Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> The major issues looks good to me for 0.11.0 release
>> >> Thank you.
>> >>
>> >> -Jinho
>> >> Best regards
>> >>
>> >> 2015-03-16 20:13 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org
>> <javascript:;>
>> >> >:
>> >>
>> >> > Hi folks,
>> >> >
>> >> > In order to share milestones with you guys and concentrate our effort
>> >> > on the next release, we need to discuss the next roadmap.
>> >> > Particularly, I'd like to share our direction with new contributors
>> >> > due to the growing number of contributors.
>> >> >
>> >> > As far as I know, the following major issues seem to be resolved in
>> time.
>> >> >
>> >> > * Nested complex type (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-721
>> )
>> >> > * in subquery (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-680)
>> >> > * Resource allocation should be fine grained (TAJO-1397)
>> >> > * ALTER TABLE ADD/DROP PARTITION statement (TAJO-744)
>> >> > * Python UDF (TAJO-1344)
>> >> >
>> >> > The above issues probably can be included in 0.11 release. If there
>> >> > are missed issues, please let me know them.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Besides, the following feature issues may be on our roadmap:
>> >> >
>> >> > * Multi-tenancy query scheduler (TAJO-540)
>> >> > * More SQL features (scalar subquery, ...)
>> >> >   * Decimal type support
>> >> >   * Scalar subquery
>> >> > * OLAP features (rollup, drill down, cube, ..)
>> >> > * More rewrite rules (lots of issues like Unnesting of Nested
>> Subqueries,
>> >> > ...)
>> >> > * Make storage handler more pluggable
>> >> > * Better failure handling of tasks and nodes (TAJO-1214)
>> >> > * CREATE FUNCTION statement support
>> >> > * CREATE TYPE statement support
>> >> > * ....
>> >> >
>> >> > Most of them are not assigned as far as I know. In addition, there
are
>> >> > many performance issues. I'll describe them later.
>> >> >
>> >> > Anyway, I would be pleasure if we task about what issues you are
>> >> > considering for 0.11 release or after that. I'm looking forward to
>> >> > hearing you guys' feedback.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Best regards,
>> >> > Hyunsik
>> >> >
>> >>
>>

Mime
View raw message