tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Azuryy Yu <azury...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Beyond 0.10.0 release
Date Tue, 17 Mar 2015 01:19:49 GMT
Thanks Hyunsik,

I will look through these features and hope can do something in future.

IMO, if Tajo supports multi-tenants and security, then we are truely better
than Impala according to my performance testing.



On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> In order to share milestones with you guys and concentrate our effort
> on the next release, we need to discuss the next roadmap.
> Particularly, I'd like to share our direction with new contributors
> due to the growing number of contributors.
>
> As far as I know, the following major issues seem to be resolved in time.
>
> * Nested complex type (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-721)
> * in subquery (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-680)
> * Resource allocation should be fine grained (TAJO-1397)
> * ALTER TABLE ADD/DROP PARTITION statement (TAJO-744)
> * Python UDF (TAJO-1344)
>
> The above issues probably can be included in 0.11 release. If there
> are missed issues, please let me know them.
>
>
> Besides, the following feature issues may be on our roadmap:
>
> * Multi-tenancy query scheduler (TAJO-540)
> * More SQL features (scalar subquery, ...)
>   * Decimal type support
>   * Scalar subquery
> * OLAP features (rollup, drill down, cube, ..)
> * More rewrite rules (lots of issues like Unnesting of Nested Subqueries,
> ...)
> * Make storage handler more pluggable
> * Better failure handling of tasks and nodes (TAJO-1214)
> * CREATE FUNCTION statement support
> * CREATE TYPE statement support
> * ....
>
> Most of them are not assigned as far as I know. In addition, there are
> many performance issues. I'll describe them later.
>
> Anyway, I would be pleasure if we task about what issues you are
> considering for 0.11 release or after that. I'm looking forward to
> hearing you guys' feedback.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Hyunsik
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message