tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Beyond 0.10.0 release
Date Wed, 18 Mar 2015 23:01:36 GMT
Absolutely!

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:

> It sounds good to me.
>
> Also remember 'if it doesn't happen on the mailing list, it doesn't
> happen at Apache'. Please read the below mailing list thread, saying
> what we must keep.
>
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCAJwFCa0CfjFGq5NcG7GNSPEZjg1hvy3NO-5_KfPd2ZXvc-SHKg@mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> Best regards,
> Hyunsik
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Today we have a Tajo regional meetup in Seoul. What about discussing this
> > issue in detail there?
> >
> > Of course, we should post the result here, too.
> >
> > Warmly,
> > Dongjoon
> >
> > On Tuesday, March 17, 2015, Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> The major issues looks good to me for 0.11.0 release
> >> Thank you.
> >>
> >> -Jinho
> >> Best regards
> >>
> >> 2015-03-16 20:13 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> >> >:
> >>
> >> > Hi folks,
> >> >
> >> > In order to share milestones with you guys and concentrate our effort
> >> > on the next release, we need to discuss the next roadmap.
> >> > Particularly, I'd like to share our direction with new contributors
> >> > due to the growing number of contributors.
> >> >
> >> > As far as I know, the following major issues seem to be resolved in
> time.
> >> >
> >> > * Nested complex type (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-721
> )
> >> > * in subquery (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-680)
> >> > * Resource allocation should be fine grained (TAJO-1397)
> >> > * ALTER TABLE ADD/DROP PARTITION statement (TAJO-744)
> >> > * Python UDF (TAJO-1344)
> >> >
> >> > The above issues probably can be included in 0.11 release. If there
> >> > are missed issues, please let me know them.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Besides, the following feature issues may be on our roadmap:
> >> >
> >> > * Multi-tenancy query scheduler (TAJO-540)
> >> > * More SQL features (scalar subquery, ...)
> >> >   * Decimal type support
> >> >   * Scalar subquery
> >> > * OLAP features (rollup, drill down, cube, ..)
> >> > * More rewrite rules (lots of issues like Unnesting of Nested
> Subqueries,
> >> > ...)
> >> > * Make storage handler more pluggable
> >> > * Better failure handling of tasks and nodes (TAJO-1214)
> >> > * CREATE FUNCTION statement support
> >> > * CREATE TYPE statement support
> >> > * ....
> >> >
> >> > Most of them are not assigned as far as I know. In addition, there are
> >> > many performance issues. I'll describe them later.
> >> >
> >> > Anyway, I would be pleasure if we task about what issues you are
> >> > considering for 0.11 release or after that. I'm looking forward to
> >> > hearing you guys' feedback.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Best regards,
> >> > Hyunsik
> >> >
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message