tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Beyond 0.10.0 release
Date Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:51:50 GMT
Today we have a Tajo regional meetup in Seoul. What about discussing this
issue in detail there?

Of course, we should post the result here, too.

Warmly,
Dongjoon

On Tuesday, March 17, 2015, Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org> wrote:

> The major issues looks good to me for 0.11.0 release
> Thank you.
>
> -Jinho
> Best regards
>
> 2015-03-16 20:13 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org <javascript:;>
> >:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > In order to share milestones with you guys and concentrate our effort
> > on the next release, we need to discuss the next roadmap.
> > Particularly, I'd like to share our direction with new contributors
> > due to the growing number of contributors.
> >
> > As far as I know, the following major issues seem to be resolved in time.
> >
> > * Nested complex type (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-721)
> > * in subquery (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-680)
> > * Resource allocation should be fine grained (TAJO-1397)
> > * ALTER TABLE ADD/DROP PARTITION statement (TAJO-744)
> > * Python UDF (TAJO-1344)
> >
> > The above issues probably can be included in 0.11 release. If there
> > are missed issues, please let me know them.
> >
> >
> > Besides, the following feature issues may be on our roadmap:
> >
> > * Multi-tenancy query scheduler (TAJO-540)
> > * More SQL features (scalar subquery, ...)
> >   * Decimal type support
> >   * Scalar subquery
> > * OLAP features (rollup, drill down, cube, ..)
> > * More rewrite rules (lots of issues like Unnesting of Nested Subqueries,
> > ...)
> > * Make storage handler more pluggable
> > * Better failure handling of tasks and nodes (TAJO-1214)
> > * CREATE FUNCTION statement support
> > * CREATE TYPE statement support
> > * ....
> >
> > Most of them are not assigned as far as I know. In addition, there are
> > many performance issues. I'll describe them later.
> >
> > Anyway, I would be pleasure if we task about what issues you are
> > considering for 0.11 release or after that. I'm looking forward to
> > hearing you guys' feedback.
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Hyunsik
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message