tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Beyond 0.10.0 release
Date Fri, 20 Mar 2015 02:33:16 GMT
I see. No problem at all for me! Then, I think the final decision is made
in Tajo Community.
The best and only way is to speed up Tajo Community Activity more.
Thank you, Hyunsik!

Best regards,
Dongjoon.

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:

> Minor release will be usually depend on our bug fixes. If we find some
> critical bug, we should release the bug fix release immediately.
> Otherwise, it can be release them monthly by merging recent bug fixes
> after some release.
>
> Best regards,
> Hyunsik
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Thank you, @hyunsik. I'm happy since the roadmap page has all of the
> > details, now.
> > By the way, could you mention that Regular Minor Release Plan in any way?
> > Or, do you want to omit the Minor Releases like 2014?
> > Both are fine to me.
> > I just want to work according to Official Tajo Roadmap.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Dongjoon.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> I roughly updated the roadmap for 0.11.0. Also, I also arranged the
> >> roadmap 1.0.0.
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TAJO/Tajo+Roadmap
> >>
> >> I welcome any feedback.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Hyunsik
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > If there are no further discussion, I'll update the Roadmap page in
> wiki.
> >> >
> >> > - hyunsik
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> Absolutely!
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> It sounds good to me.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Also remember 'if it doesn't happen on the mailing list, it doesn't
> >> >>> happen at Apache'. Please read the below mailing list thread, saying
> >> >>> what we must keep.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCAJwFCa0CfjFGq5NcG7GNSPEZjg1hvy3NO-5_KfPd2ZXvc-SHKg@mail.gmail.com%3E
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Best regards,
> >> >>> Hyunsik
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org
> >
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> > Today we have a Tajo regional meetup in Seoul. What about
> discussing
> >> this
> >> >>> > issue in detail there?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Of course, we should post the result here, too.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Warmly,
> >> >>> > Dongjoon
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On Tuesday, March 17, 2015, Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org>
wrote:
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> The major issues looks good to me for 0.11.0 release
> >> >>> >> Thank you.
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> -Jinho
> >> >>> >> Best regards
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> 2015-03-16 20:13 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org
> >> >>> <javascript:;>
> >> >>> >> >:
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> > Hi folks,
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > In order to share milestones with you guys and concentrate
our
> >> effort
> >> >>> >> > on the next release, we need to discuss the next
roadmap.
> >> >>> >> > Particularly, I'd like to share our direction with
new
> >> contributors
> >> >>> >> > due to the growing number of contributors.
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > As far as I know, the following major issues seem
to be
> resolved
> >> in
> >> >>> time.
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > * Nested complex type (
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-721
> >> >>> )
> >> >>> >> > * in subquery (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-680)
> >> >>> >> > * Resource allocation should be fine grained (TAJO-1397)
> >> >>> >> > * ALTER TABLE ADD/DROP PARTITION statement (TAJO-744)
> >> >>> >> > * Python UDF (TAJO-1344)
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > The above issues probably can be included in 0.11
release. If
> >> there
> >> >>> >> > are missed issues, please let me know them.
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > Besides, the following feature issues may be on our
roadmap:
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > * Multi-tenancy query scheduler (TAJO-540)
> >> >>> >> > * More SQL features (scalar subquery, ...)
> >> >>> >> >   * Decimal type support
> >> >>> >> >   * Scalar subquery
> >> >>> >> > * OLAP features (rollup, drill down, cube, ..)
> >> >>> >> > * More rewrite rules (lots of issues like Unnesting
of Nested
> >> >>> Subqueries,
> >> >>> >> > ...)
> >> >>> >> > * Make storage handler more pluggable
> >> >>> >> > * Better failure handling of tasks and nodes (TAJO-1214)
> >> >>> >> > * CREATE FUNCTION statement support
> >> >>> >> > * CREATE TYPE statement support
> >> >>> >> > * ....
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > Most of them are not assigned as far as I know. In
addition,
> >> there are
> >> >>> >> > many performance issues. I'll describe them later.
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > Anyway, I would be pleasure if we task about what
issues you
> are
> >> >>> >> > considering for 0.11 release or after that. I'm looking
> forward to
> >> >>> >> > hearing you guys' feedback.
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > Best regards,
> >> >>> >> > Hyunsik
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message