Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tajo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@tajo.apache.org
Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jhjung@gruter.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAEj1Ex51PcHp+kVoZcnCUunB_DyY921z8s9mqPBsPOUJNG7H9Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAM=XDd8-ZPtf00FyRuSy9NSgwhyhhGA1MaWTxhQTM5iM_kdM9Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM=XDd-3j231MXw_qMxdzEq+OZMtS5VBbMihyNZuaFa5fY96cQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEj1Ex51PcHp+kVoZcnCUunB_DyY921z8s9mqPBsPOUJNG7H9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:25:17 +0900
Message-ID: 
 <CAM5pAEyCVfiNbG=C7Dj2+U7p5KXei+o1hHUr81+MLZ-epUh1Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Tajo 0.10.0 (RC0)
From: Jaehwa Jung <blrunner@apache.org>
To: "dev@tajo.apache.org" <dev@tajo.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134fcfa0c5f66050fdf82e4

--001a1134fcfa0c5f66050fdf82e4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I also agree with Jihun's opinion. :)


2015-02-25 8:44 GMT+09:00 Jihun Kang <ykrips@gmail.com>:

> I agree with your suggestion. We don't need to include source files if we
> release source tarball and binary tarball. In addition, how about exclude=
s
> test jars from binary tarball? Test source files can be included in sourc=
e
> tarball, I think.
> 2015. 2. 25. =EC=98=A4=EC=A0=84 5:01=EC=97=90 "Hyunsik Choi" <hyunsik@apa=
che.org>=EB=8B=98=EC=9D=B4 =EC=9E=91=EC=84=B1:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The binary tarball is mostly used to launch Tajo clusters. So I think
> > that source jars in binary tarball itself is unnecessary in general.
> > In addition, we also provide source jars through maven, and most of
> > users will download and use source jars in this way. In my opinion, It
> > would be better if a binary tarball does not include source tarball.
> >
> > How do you think about that?
> >
> > - hyunsik
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > This vote is canceled due to wrong version in some pom files.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >> Hi guys,
> > >>
> > >> Thank you for your review. I'll cancel this release vote, and then
> > >> I'll call a vote for new release tarball after I reflect your
> > >> comments.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Hyunsik
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>> Hyunsik,
> > >>>
> > >>> In addition, I found unmodified pom.xml and sphinx doc. Could you
> > remove it
> > >>> ?
> > >>> Here is my grep :
> > >>>
> > >>> kimjh:tajo-0.10.0-src kimjh$ grep -r  'SNAPSHOT' ./
> > >>> .//CHANGES:    2.6.0-SNAPSHOT. (jaehwa)
> > >>> .//pom.xml:    <tajo.version>0.9.0-SNAPSHOT</tajo.version>
> > >>> .//tajo-catalog/tajo-catalog-drivers/tajo-hcatalog/pom.xml:
> > >>>  <version>0.10.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
> > >>> .//tajo-common/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/util/VersionInfo.java:
>  *
> > >>> @return the Tajo version string, eg. "0.9.0-SNAPSHOT"
> > >>> .//tajo-docs/pom.xml:    <version>0.9.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
> > >>> .//tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/configuration/catalog_configuration.rs=
t:
> > $ ls
> > >>> tajo-dist/target/tajo-x.y.z-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz
> > >>> .//tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/getting_started.rst:  $ ls
> > >>> tajo-dist/target/tajo-x.y.z-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz
> > >>> .//tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/getting_started.rst:  $ tar xzvf
> > >>> ${TAJO_SRC}/tajo-dist/target/tajo-x.y.z-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz
> > >>>
> > >>> -Jinho
> > >>> Best regards
> > >>>
> > >>> 2015-02-23 14:27 GMT+09:00 Jaehwa Jung <blrunner@apache.org>:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi Guys
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I also agree with Jinho's opinion. It may be an issue for installi=
ng
> > Tajo.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Cheers
> > >>>> Jaehwa
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 2015-02-23 13:55 GMT+09:00 Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org>:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> > Thank you for your work.
> > >>>> > I found source jar in binary tarball. In my opinion, we should
> move
> > these
> > >>>> > jars to a source directory. because source jars included in
> > classpath.
> > >>>> > How do you think ?
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > -Jinho
> > >>>> > Best regards
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > 2015-02-21 9:40 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>:
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > > Hi folks,
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > I have created an Apache Tajo 0.10.0 release candidate (rc0).
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > This is a major release which includes lots of new features, b=
ug
> > >>>> > > fixes, and improvements. Especially, this release includes
> > >>>> > > lightweight JDBC driver, HBase storage integration, hadoop
> > >>>> > > dependency removal from Tajo client, and
> > >>>> > > improved Amazon S3 support.
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > The RC0 is available at:
> > >>>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tajo/tajo-0.10.0-rc0/
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > Nexus Staging URL:
> > >>>> > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetajo-1002/
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > The RC0 tag in git is here:
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>>
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=3Dtajo.git;a=3Dcommit;h=3D95f13=
b3a0ba651b1b67d126b06ce92a10cbe5eff
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > Release notes is at:
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>>
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tajo/tajo-0.10.0-rc0/relnotes.html
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the
> > release can
> > >>>> > > currently be found at:
> > http://people.apache.org/keys/group/tajo.asc
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > Please vote:
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > [ ] +1 release the RC0 as tajo-0.10.0
> > >>>> > > [ ] + 0 no opinion
> > >>>> > > [ ] -1 do not release this package because ...
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > Here is my +1.
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > Best regards,
> > >>>> > > Hyunsik Choi
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>>
> >
>

--001a1134fcfa0c5f66050fdf82e4--