tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jihoon Son <jihoon...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Tajo 0.10.0 (RC0)
Date Wed, 25 Feb 2015 05:08:42 GMT
Sorry for wrong email address. I repeat the same message.

Hi guys,
+1 for Hyunsik and Jihun suggestions. We don't need to include test jars to
the binary release.

Sincerely,
Jihoon

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:07 PM Jihoon Son <ghoonson@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi guys,
> +1 for Hyunsik and Jihun suggestions. We don't need to include test jars
> to the binary release.
>
> Sincerely,
> Jihoon
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:46 AM Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> Test binary jars does not included in source tarball
>>
>> -Jinho
>> Best regards
>>
>> 2015-02-25 10:25 GMT+09:00 Jaehwa Jung <blrunner@apache.org>:
>>
>> > I also agree with Jihun's opinion. :)
>> >
>> >
>> > 2015-02-25 8:44 GMT+09:00 Jihun Kang <ykrips@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > > I agree with your suggestion. We don't need to include source files
>> if we
>> > > release source tarball and binary tarball. In addition, how about
>> > excludes
>> > > test jars from binary tarball? Test source files can be included in
>> > source
>> > > tarball, I think.
>> > > 2015. 2. 25. 오전 5:01에 "Hyunsik Choi" <hyunsik@apache.org>님이
작성:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > The binary tarball is mostly used to launch Tajo clusters. So I
>> think
>> > > > that source jars in binary tarball itself is unnecessary in general.
>> > > > In addition, we also provide source jars through maven, and most of
>> > > > users will download and use source jars in this way. In my opinion,
>> It
>> > > > would be better if a binary tarball does not include source tarball.
>> > > >
>> > > > How do you think about that?
>> > > >
>> > > > - hyunsik
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > This vote is canceled due to wrong version in some pom files.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >> Hi guys,
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Thank you for your review. I'll cancel this release vote,
and
>> then
>> > > > >> I'll call a vote for new release tarball after I reflect
your
>> > > > >> comments.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Thanks,
>> > > > >> Hyunsik
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > >>> Hyunsik,
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> In addition, I found unmodified pom.xml and sphinx doc.
Could
>> you
>> > > > remove it
>> > > > >>> ?
>> > > > >>> Here is my grep :
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> kimjh:tajo-0.10.0-src kimjh$ grep -r  'SNAPSHOT' ./
>> > > > >>> .//CHANGES:    2.6.0-SNAPSHOT. (jaehwa)
>> > > > >>> .//pom.xml:    <tajo.version>0.9.0-SNAPSHOT</tajo.version>
>> > > > >>> .//tajo-catalog/tajo-catalog-drivers/tajo-hcatalog/pom.xml:
>> > > > >>>  <version>0.10.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>> > > > >>> .//tajo-common/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/util/VersionInf
>> o.java:
>> > >  *
>> > > > >>> @return the Tajo version string, eg. "0.9.0-SNAPSHOT"
>> > > > >>> .//tajo-docs/pom.xml:    <version>0.9.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>> > > > >>>
>> > .//tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/configuration/catalog_configuration.rst:
>> > > > $ ls
>> > > > >>> tajo-dist/target/tajo-x.y.z-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz
>> > > > >>> .//tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/getting_started.rst:  $
ls
>> > > > >>> tajo-dist/target/tajo-x.y.z-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz
>> > > > >>> .//tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/getting_started.rst:  $
tar xzvf
>> > > > >>> ${TAJO_SRC}/tajo-dist/target/tajo-x.y.z-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> -Jinho
>> > > > >>> Best regards
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> 2015-02-23 14:27 GMT+09:00 Jaehwa Jung <blrunner@apache.org>:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>> Hi Guys
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> I also agree with Jinho's opinion. It may be an issue
for
>> > installing
>> > > > Tajo.
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> Cheers
>> > > > >>>> Jaehwa
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> 2015-02-23 13:55 GMT+09:00 Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org>:
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> > Thank you for your work.
>> > > > >>>> > I found source jar in binary tarball. In my
opinion, we
>> should
>> > > move
>> > > > these
>> > > > >>>> > jars to a source directory. because source jars
included in
>> > > > classpath.
>> > > > >>>> > How do you think ?
>> > > > >>>> >
>> > > > >>>> > -Jinho
>> > > > >>>> > Best regards
>> > > > >>>> >
>> > > > >>>> > 2015-02-21 9:40 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>:
>> > > > >>>> >
>> > > > >>>> > > Hi folks,
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> > > I have created an Apache Tajo 0.10.0 release
candidate
>> (rc0).
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> > > This is a major release which includes
lots of new
>> features,
>> > bug
>> > > > >>>> > > fixes, and improvements. Especially, this
release includes
>> > > > >>>> > > lightweight JDBC driver, HBase storage
integration, hadoop
>> > > > >>>> > > dependency removal from Tajo client, and
>> > > > >>>> > > improved Amazon S3 support.
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> > > The RC0 is available at:
>> > > > >>>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>> dist/dev/tajo/tajo-0.10.0-rc0/
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> > > Nexus Staging URL:
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>> tajo-1002/
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> > > The RC0 tag in git is here:
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> >
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tajo.git;a=commit;h=
>> 95f13b3a0ba651b1b67d126b06ce92a10cbe5eff
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> > > Release notes is at:
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> >
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tajo/tajo-0.10.0-rc0/
>> relnotes.html
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> > > and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys
used to sign the
>> > > > release can
>> > > > >>>> > > currently be found at:
>> > > > http://people.apache.org/keys/group/tajo.asc
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> > > Please vote:
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> > > [ ] +1 release the RC0 as tajo-0.10.0
>> > > > >>>> > > [ ] + 0 no opinion
>> > > > >>>> > > [ ] -1 do not release this package because
...
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> > > Here is my +1.
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> > > Best regards,
>> > > > >>>> > > Hyunsik Choi
>> > > > >>>> > >
>> > > > >>>> >
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message