Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tajo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@tajo.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAM=XDd_fUuwsKRkEy3Bkr+yd-5GT2Md013au+0+5UT8PoFU1YQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAM=XDd-zMjmZumQTwVX+nTCuwho6H6OJFm1rUSV1mXJpZjsQpw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM5pAEwfGAeaG8RnDBEQHGVvDFGbHNEFdHb_B795TBc-kzBQow@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH=F5dkrBP=Gtz0dqRuE1fefruVV9MAnM1eJXwEby2OcDAjNNw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEj1Ex7k=d1P6SziU7n-S2z8CXan=+gy1VqfH=nDHA_wjdiMDg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACZfFK7SV1nwY6syCNOWhpG9Hm5Dv=GZNBn2xXQDCu0hJD5gFA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM=XDd9YmDSr+FhO9eCCXreaA8pdxFBJLDCmobfM2mukbEeaBg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACZfFK5Y+iOnwKYY191qFUdeiHRF7mjaZ4BKbU-Y8Hqh=BoZXg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANpXwBDMNGqGoh8m6EK7J2wsiLS6wvyMA=yJHR1H3AqF9245oQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM5pAEyk0V3TN_h7EwtT+awjEzVgKpAV=y64TsU2itRBspwmdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM=XDd8vQS58iWOLXj++TswS+vTn7S4-S2e5yXSVEWX8o=yB0Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANpXwBCdoydj2rS1KWDOUAt56x30A=n9DiEnX11AS5jfsY5Ghw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH=F5d=eEQURbcsDoMbFhRmtx++=qYKyapxeL-x22UG++oSOjQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM=XDd_fUuwsKRkEy3Bkr+yd-5GT2Md013au+0+5UT8PoFU1YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:26:04 +0900
Message-ID: 
 <CAM=XDd-HTqx7mEHLhUWFnhFCPEPGFULA5y8=JAaGqCSeE2g+Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] 0.9.1 release
From: Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
To: "dev@tajo.apache.org" <dev@tajo.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I changed the version in jira to 0.10 from 0.9.1.

Also, there still are not few issues in 0.10. We need to concentrate
on the remain issues in order to release 0.10 in time.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO/fixforversion/12328654/?selected=
Tab=3Dcom.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:version-issues-panel

-hyunsik

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm happy that you guys consent to go 0.10. Let's go ahead.
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org> wrote:
>>  +1 for 0.10.0
>>
>> -Jinho
>> Best regards
>>
>> 2014-12-18 2:04 GMT+09:00 Hyoungjun Kim <hjkim@apache.org>:
>>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>> I think that current change is major because many interfaces(TajoClient=
,
>>> StorageManager) are changed.
>>>
>>> +1 for 0.10.0
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Hyoungjun
>>>
>>> 2014-12-18 1:53 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>:
>>> >
>>> > In my view, we can easily find out two digit version policy (e.g.,
>>> > 0.10) in famous open source projects like gnome, scala language,
>>> > ubuntu and so on. Therefore, in my opinion, two digit version is not
>>> > matter.
>>> >
>>> > So, I think that we only need to decide whether is a major or minor
>>> > change. If it is major, we can use 0.10. Otherwise, we can use 0.9.1.
>>> > 1.0 would be not candidate.
>>> >
>>> > Best regards,
>>> > Hyunsik
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Jaehwa Jung <blrunner@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > Hi folks,
>>> > >
>>> > > +1 for 0.10.0
>>> > >
>>> > > I think that users will be familiar with the version because of hiv=
e
>>> and
>>> > > pig.
>>> > >
>>> > > Cheers
>>> > > Jaehwa
>>> > > 2014. 12. 15. =EC=98=A4=ED=9B=84 6:45=EC=97=90 "Hyoungjun Kim" <hjk=
im@apache.org>=EB=8B=98=EC=9D=B4 =EC=9E=91=EC=84=B1:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Hi,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I think that Tajo is not ready for 1.0.0 and 0.10.0 version is
>>> unusual
>>> > >> version.
>>> > >> So, I give +1 for 0.9.1
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Best Regards,
>>> > >> Hyoungjun
>>> > >>
>>> > >> 2014-12-15 18:40 GMT+09:00 Jihoon Son <jihoonson@apache.org>:
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Hyunsik,
>>> > >> > I missed my vote.
>>> > >> > I think that Tajo can provide product-level functions, and there=
 are
>>> > many
>>> > >> > real use cases.
>>> > >> > So, I would like to give +1 for 1.0.0 rather than 0.10.0.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Sincerely,
>>> > >> > Jihoon
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > 2014-12-15 16:41 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>:
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > > Hi Jihoon,
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > I'm happy to hear your suggestion. Yes, you are right. The cur=
rent
>>> > >> > > master branch includes lots of significant changes. Actually, =
I
>>> > didn't
>>> > >> > > expect that when I make 0.9.1 roadmap in Jira. I agree with yo=
ur
>>> > >> > > suggestion.
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > BTW, we need to hear other guy's thinkings. Could you a make a
>>> vote
>>> > >> > > for 0.9.1 vs 0.10?
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > Best regards,
>>> > >> > > Hyunsik
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Jihoon Son <jihoonson@apache.=
org
>>> >
>>> > >> > wrote:
>>> > >> > > > Hi folks,
>>> > >> > > > I agree on that this is the right time to release a new vers=
ion
>>> of
>>> > >> > Tajo.
>>> > >> > > > However, on the version number, I have another idea.
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > I think that this release involves large changes from variou=
s
>>> > >> > > perspectives,
>>> > >> > > > such as client API, HBase integration, and so on.
>>> > >> > > > So, I'd like to suggest to make a major release rather than
>>> 0.9.1.
>>> > >> > > > What do you think about it?
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > If you agree, we will have two choices of Hadoop-style
>>> versioning
>>> > >> > > (0.10.0)
>>> > >> > > > and traditional versioning(1.0.0).
>>> > >> > > > I hope to hear any opinions from you.
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > Sincerely,
>>> > >> > > > Jihoon
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > 2014-12-13 15:14 GMT+09:00 Jihun Kang <ykrips@gmail.com>:
>>> > >> > > >>
>>> > >> > > >> Hello hyunsik,
>>> > >> > > >>
>>> > >> > > >> Any critical issues are not found on 0.9.1, and it would be
>>> > great if
>>> > >> > we
>>> > >> > > >> release next version.
>>> > >> > > >>
>>> > >> > > >> Thanks and best regards.
>>> > >> > > >> Jihun Kang
>>> > >> > > >>
>>> > >> > > >>
>>> > >> > > >> 2014-12-12 16:51 GMT+09:00 Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org>:
>>> > >> > > >> >
>>> > >> > > >> >  +1 I agree
>>> > >> > > >> >
>>> > >> > > >> > -Jinho
>>> > >> > > >> > Best regards
>>> > >> > > >> >
>>> > >> > > >> > 2014-12-12 10:55 GMT+09:00 Jaehwa Jung <blrunner@apache.o=
rg
>>> >:
>>> > >> > > >> > >
>>> > >> > > >> > > Hi Hyunsik,
>>> > >> > > >> > >
>>> > >> > > >> > > +1
>>> > >> > > >> > >
>>> > >> > > >> > > The time has come for 0.9.1 release.
>>> > >> > > >> > > For reference, I'll fix an issue which assigned to me t=
his
>>> > week.
>>> > >> > > >> > >
>>> > >> > > >> > > Cheer,
>>> > >> > > >> > > Jaehwa
>>> > >> > > >> > >
>>> > >> > > >> > >
>>> > >> > > >> > >
>>> > >> > > >> > >
>>> > >> > > >> > > 2014-12-12 1:00 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.=
org
>>> >:
>>> > >> > > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > >> > > > Hi folks,
>>> > >> > > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > >> > > > There are not many issues scheduled to 0.9.1.
>>> > >> > > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > >> > >
>>> > >> > > >> >
>>> > >> > > >>
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-940?jql=3Dproject%20%3D%20TA=
JO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20B=
Y%20priority%20DESC
>>> > >> > > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > >> > > > It's right time to discuss 0.9.1 release. I think tha=
t
>>> > there
>>> > >> are
>>> > >> > > few
>>> > >> > > >> > > > important issues in 0.9.1. Others look trivial, and w=
e
>>> can
>>> > >> > > reschedule
>>> > >> > > >> > > > them to 0.9.2 release.
>>> > >> > > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > >> > > > If you guys agree with my proposal, I'll start the
>>> release
>>> > >> work
>>> > >> > > soon.
>>> > >> > > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > >> > > > Best regards,
>>> > >> > > >> > > > Hyunsik
>>> > >> > > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > >> > >
>>> > >> > > >> >
>>> > >> > > >>
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>