tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hyoungjun Kim <hj...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] 0.9.1 release
Date Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:45:06 GMT
Hi,

I think that Tajo is not ready for 1.0.0 and 0.10.0 version is  unusual
version.
So, I give +1 for 0.9.1

Best Regards,
Hyoungjun

2014-12-15 18:40 GMT+09:00 Jihoon Son <jihoonson@apache.org>:
>
> Hyunsik,
> I missed my vote.
> I think that Tajo can provide product-level functions, and there are many
> real use cases.
> So, I would like to give +1 for 1.0.0 rather than 0.10.0.
>
> Sincerely,
> Jihoon
>
> 2014-12-15 16:41 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi Jihoon,
> >
> > I'm happy to hear your suggestion. Yes, you are right. The current
> > master branch includes lots of significant changes. Actually, I didn't
> > expect that when I make 0.9.1 roadmap in Jira. I agree with your
> > suggestion.
> >
> > BTW, we need to hear other guy's thinkings. Could you a make a vote
> > for 0.9.1 vs 0.10?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Hyunsik
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Jihoon Son <jihoonson@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > > I agree on that this is the right time to release a new version of
> Tajo.
> > > However, on the version number, I have another idea.
> > >
> > > I think that this release involves large changes from various
> > perspectives,
> > > such as client API, HBase integration, and so on.
> > > So, I'd like to suggest to make a major release rather than 0.9.1.
> > > What do you think about it?
> > >
> > > If you agree, we will have two choices of Hadoop-style versioning
> > (0.10.0)
> > > and traditional versioning(1.0.0).
> > > I hope to hear any opinions from you.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Jihoon
> > >
> > > 2014-12-13 15:14 GMT+09:00 Jihun Kang <ykrips@gmail.com>:
> > >>
> > >> Hello hyunsik,
> > >>
> > >> Any critical issues are not found on 0.9.1, and it would be great if
> we
> > >> release next version.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks and best regards.
> > >> Jihun Kang
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2014-12-12 16:51 GMT+09:00 Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org>:
> > >> >
> > >> >  +1 I agree
> > >> >
> > >> > -Jinho
> > >> > Best regards
> > >> >
> > >> > 2014-12-12 10:55 GMT+09:00 Jaehwa Jung <blrunner@apache.org>:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Hi Hyunsik,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > +1
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The time has come for 0.9.1 release.
> > >> > > For reference, I'll fix an issue which assigned to me this week.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Cheer,
> > >> > > Jaehwa
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > 2014-12-12 1:00 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Hi folks,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > There are not many issues scheduled to 0.9.1.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-940?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > It's right time to discuss 0.9.1 release. I think that there
are
> > few
> > >> > > > important issues in 0.9.1. Others look trivial, and we can
> > reschedule
> > >> > > > them to 0.9.2 release.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > If you guys agree with my proposal, I'll start the release
work
> > soon.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Best regards,
> > >> > > > Hyunsik
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message