tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hyoungjun Kim <hj...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] 0.9.1 release
Date Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:04:28 GMT
Hi folks,
I think that current change is major because many interfaces(TajoClient,
StorageManager) are changed.

+1 for 0.10.0

Best regards,
Hyoungjun

2014-12-18 1:53 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>:
>
> In my view, we can easily find out two digit version policy (e.g.,
> 0.10) in famous open source projects like gnome, scala language,
> ubuntu and so on. Therefore, in my opinion, two digit version is not
> matter.
>
> So, I think that we only need to decide whether is a major or minor
> change. If it is major, we can use 0.10. Otherwise, we can use 0.9.1.
> 1.0 would be not candidate.
>
> Best regards,
> Hyunsik
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Jaehwa Jung <blrunner@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > +1 for 0.10.0
> >
> > I think that users will be familiar with the version because of hive and
> > pig.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Jaehwa
> > 2014. 12. 15. 오후 6:45에 "Hyoungjun Kim" <hjkim@apache.org>님이 작성:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I think that Tajo is not ready for 1.0.0 and 0.10.0 version is  unusual
> >> version.
> >> So, I give +1 for 0.9.1
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Hyoungjun
> >>
> >> 2014-12-15 18:40 GMT+09:00 Jihoon Son <jihoonson@apache.org>:
> >> >
> >> > Hyunsik,
> >> > I missed my vote.
> >> > I think that Tajo can provide product-level functions, and there are
> many
> >> > real use cases.
> >> > So, I would like to give +1 for 1.0.0 rather than 0.10.0.
> >> >
> >> > Sincerely,
> >> > Jihoon
> >> >
> >> > 2014-12-15 16:41 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi Jihoon,
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm happy to hear your suggestion. Yes, you are right. The current
> >> > > master branch includes lots of significant changes. Actually, I
> didn't
> >> > > expect that when I make 0.9.1 roadmap in Jira. I agree with your
> >> > > suggestion.
> >> > >
> >> > > BTW, we need to hear other guy's thinkings. Could you a make a vote
> >> > > for 0.9.1 vs 0.10?
> >> > >
> >> > > Best regards,
> >> > > Hyunsik
> >> > >
> >> > > On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Jihoon Son <jihoonson@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > > Hi folks,
> >> > > > I agree on that this is the right time to release a new version
of
> >> > Tajo.
> >> > > > However, on the version number, I have another idea.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I think that this release involves large changes from various
> >> > > perspectives,
> >> > > > such as client API, HBase integration, and so on.
> >> > > > So, I'd like to suggest to make a major release rather than 0.9.1.
> >> > > > What do you think about it?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > If you agree, we will have two choices of Hadoop-style versioning
> >> > > (0.10.0)
> >> > > > and traditional versioning(1.0.0).
> >> > > > I hope to hear any opinions from you.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Sincerely,
> >> > > > Jihoon
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 2014-12-13 15:14 GMT+09:00 Jihun Kang <ykrips@gmail.com>:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Hello hyunsik,
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Any critical issues are not found on 0.9.1, and it would
be
> great if
> >> > we
> >> > > >> release next version.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Thanks and best regards.
> >> > > >> Jihun Kang
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> 2014-12-12 16:51 GMT+09:00 Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org>:
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >  +1 I agree
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > -Jinho
> >> > > >> > Best regards
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > 2014-12-12 10:55 GMT+09:00 Jaehwa Jung <blrunner@apache.org>:
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > Hi Hyunsik,
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > +1
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > The time has come for 0.9.1 release.
> >> > > >> > > For reference, I'll fix an issue which assigned
to me this
> week.
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > Cheer,
> >> > > >> > > Jaehwa
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > 2014-12-12 1:00 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>:
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > > Hi folks,
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > > There are not many issues scheduled to 0.9.1.
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-940?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > > It's right time to discuss 0.9.1 release.
I think that
> there
> >> are
> >> > > few
> >> > > >> > > > important issues in 0.9.1. Others look trivial,
and we can
> >> > > reschedule
> >> > > >> > > > them to 0.9.2 release.
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > > If you guys agree with my proposal, I'll start
the release
> >> work
> >> > > soon.
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > > Best regards,
> >> > > >> > > > Hyunsik
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message