tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jaehwa Jung <blrun...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] 0.9.1 release
Date Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:56:31 GMT
Hi folks,

+1 for 0.10.0

I think that users will be familiar with the version because of hive and
pig.

Cheers
Jaehwa
2014. 12. 15. 오후 6:45에 "Hyoungjun Kim" <hjkim@apache.org>님이 작성:

> Hi,
>
> I think that Tajo is not ready for 1.0.0 and 0.10.0 version is  unusual
> version.
> So, I give +1 for 0.9.1
>
> Best Regards,
> Hyoungjun
>
> 2014-12-15 18:40 GMT+09:00 Jihoon Son <jihoonson@apache.org>:
> >
> > Hyunsik,
> > I missed my vote.
> > I think that Tajo can provide product-level functions, and there are many
> > real use cases.
> > So, I would like to give +1 for 1.0.0 rather than 0.10.0.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Jihoon
> >
> > 2014-12-15 16:41 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hi Jihoon,
> > >
> > > I'm happy to hear your suggestion. Yes, you are right. The current
> > > master branch includes lots of significant changes. Actually, I didn't
> > > expect that when I make 0.9.1 roadmap in Jira. I agree with your
> > > suggestion.
> > >
> > > BTW, we need to hear other guy's thinkings. Could you a make a vote
> > > for 0.9.1 vs 0.10?
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Hyunsik
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Jihoon Son <jihoonson@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > > I agree on that this is the right time to release a new version of
> > Tajo.
> > > > However, on the version number, I have another idea.
> > > >
> > > > I think that this release involves large changes from various
> > > perspectives,
> > > > such as client API, HBase integration, and so on.
> > > > So, I'd like to suggest to make a major release rather than 0.9.1.
> > > > What do you think about it?
> > > >
> > > > If you agree, we will have two choices of Hadoop-style versioning
> > > (0.10.0)
> > > > and traditional versioning(1.0.0).
> > > > I hope to hear any opinions from you.
> > > >
> > > > Sincerely,
> > > > Jihoon
> > > >
> > > > 2014-12-13 15:14 GMT+09:00 Jihun Kang <ykrips@gmail.com>:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hello hyunsik,
> > > >>
> > > >> Any critical issues are not found on 0.9.1, and it would be great
if
> > we
> > > >> release next version.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks and best regards.
> > > >> Jihun Kang
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> 2014-12-12 16:51 GMT+09:00 Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org>:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >  +1 I agree
> > > >> >
> > > >> > -Jinho
> > > >> > Best regards
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 2014-12-12 10:55 GMT+09:00 Jaehwa Jung <blrunner@apache.org>:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Hi Hyunsik,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > +1
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > The time has come for 0.9.1 release.
> > > >> > > For reference, I'll fix an issue which assigned to me this
week.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Cheer,
> > > >> > > Jaehwa
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > 2014-12-12 1:00 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > There are not many issues scheduled to 0.9.1.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-940?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > It's right time to discuss 0.9.1 release. I think that
there
> are
> > > few
> > > >> > > > important issues in 0.9.1. Others look trivial, and
we can
> > > reschedule
> > > >> > > > them to 0.9.2 release.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > If you guys agree with my proposal, I'll start the
release
> work
> > > soon.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Best regards,
> > > >> > > > Hyunsik
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message