tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jong-young Park <emine...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Timezone issues
Date Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:24:18 GMT
Hi, Jaewoong.

To express time period value, IntervalDatum is existing as I know.

So I think it is right that TimeDatum is for some time point.

And TimestampDatum seems it is doing both roles of DateDatum and TimeDatum.

Regards,
Jongyoung.

On Wed Nov 19 2014 at 오후 5:23:40 Jaewoong Jung <jungjw@gmail.com> wrote:

> It turns out, TAJO-1191 is slightly more complicated than I thought.
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1191)
>
> Basically, it's about whether TimeDatum may have a timezone tied with
> it. I **believe** TimeDatum is originally designed to hold a time
> period value, not an instant. (TimestampDatum seems to be the
> canonical container for instants.) So, it doesn't make sense to apply
> any timezones to TimeDatum values, but it's being done in a few
> places. And, that's why the test is failing on my machines.
>
> I'm going to try to fix it by removing all timezone-related references
> around the class, but I want to check my assumption with you before I
> proceed.
>
> What do you think about it?
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message