tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Azuryy Yu <azury...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 0.9.0 release
Date Thu, 09 Oct 2014 01:17:37 GMT
Thanks Hyunsik.

On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Finally, the master branch seems to be ready to be released as 0.9.0.
>
> The current remain issues already are patch available status and all
> issues will be committed soon.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO/fixforversion/12325340
>
> After they are committed, I'll make the first 0.9.0 release candidate.
>
> Best regards,
> Hyunsik
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:
> > Here is the remain issues for 0.9.0 release.
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1071?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> >
> > Most of them are patch available.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> Most of remain issues scheduled to 0.9.0 are patch available. I think
> >> that we can start 0.9.0 release process soon.
> >>
> >> - Hyunsik
> >>
> >> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>> I've checked the user document of development version. Some pages are
> >>> outdated. In addition to adding new docs, we need to update docs for
> >>> 0.9.0 release.
> >>>
> >>> I've described what we need to update in
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1052. It would be great if
> >>> you guys take and resolve some of them.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Hyunsik
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>
> >>>> I've rescheduled the remain issues which are not critical in 0.9.0.
> >>>>
> >>>> The remain issues are as follows:
> >>>> http://goo.gl/dJ9X9F
> >>>>
> >>>> If there are more issues which should be resolved in 0.9.0, feel free
> >>>> to reschedule them.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Hyunsik
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>> Yes, I totally agree with you guys. We need to update documentation.
> >>>>> Actually, I expect that our documentation explains about 1/3 features
> >>>>> of all features that Tajo provide.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've created the jira issue for 0.9.0 documentation, and I've moved
> >>>>> the jira issue from 0.8.0 documentation issue to new jira. We also
> >>>>> need to create more jira for new and updated documentation. Feel
free
> >>>>> to create new jira.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Also, I'll reschedule some jira issues which are not critical to
> next version.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>> Hyunsik
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jihoon Son <jihoonson@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi guys,
> >>>>>> I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release.
> >>>>>> Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule
them
> for future
> >>>>>> releases.
> >>>>>> Here is my +1.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think
that
> it will
> >>>>>> helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example,
> each of
> >>>>>> us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on
that
> topic are
> >>>>>> resolved.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Jihoon
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <maihaithanh@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed
and
> complete
> >>>>>>> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also
be nice
> if there
> >>>>>>> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related
projects.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sincerely,
> >>>>>>> Thanh
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <eminency@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> > I glanced the change note.
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > It looks sufficient to get +1.
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > Thanks.
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <
> hyunsik@apache.org>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > > Hi folks,
> >>>>>>> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1
release. For
> release,
> >>>>>>> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete
features
> and
> >>>>>>> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry
for that
> again.
> >>>>>>> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots
of codes and
> made Tajo
> >>>>>>> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months,
some guys
> have
> >>>>>>> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies
as
> production. I'm
> >>>>>>> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can
officially post
> very
> >>>>>>> > > interesting news in Apache blog.
> >>>>>>> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time
to discuss
> 0.9.0
> >>>>>>> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even
though 50
> issues are
> >>>>>>> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that
most of them
> can be
> >>>>>>> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few
critical
> issues which
> >>>>>>> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0.
> >>>>>>> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like
to reschedule
> >>>>>>> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work
for 0.9.0
> release.
> >>>>>>> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea.
> >>>>>>> > > Best regards,
> >>>>>>> > > Hyunsik
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message