Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tajo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@tajo.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACZfFK4MUM8tiMRj7P23m34DLbs=2M_LJ8n3cuHWDBDGkQcRrA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAM=XDd-rYOoG5GxLNmterXgkEaLT3Oqh6y6RTftEw6LMFYSXrw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1410960438252.0ce1b659@Nodemailer>
	<CA+OkO53e2aiwQUaCXXMgHVZz0=UyGnSEoWVD67Vx_vfEhE3kdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACZfFK4MUM8tiMRj7P23m34DLbs=2M_LJ8n3cuHWDBDGkQcRrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:19:07 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAM=XDd_Ox5pY7mgS-fAAkSPhvpdzKQ_pHLgVReHsifqJneVo6A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 0.9.0 release
From: Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
To: "dev@tajo.apache.org" <dev@tajo.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Yes, I totally agree with you guys. We need to update documentation.
Actually, I expect that our documentation explains about 1/3 features
of all features that Tajo provide.

I've created the jira issue for 0.9.0 documentation, and I've moved
the jira issue from 0.8.0 documentation issue to new jira. We also
need to create more jira for new and updated documentation. Feel free
to create new jira.

Also, I'll reschedule some jira issues which are not critical to next version.

Best regards,
Hyunsik


On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jihoon Son <jihoonson@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release.
> Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule them for future
> releases.
> Here is my +1.
>
> Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think that it will
> helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example, each of
> us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on that topic are
> resolved.
>
> Thanks,
> Jihoon
>
>
> 2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <maihaithanh@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and complete
>> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice if there
>> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Thanh
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <eminency@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I glanced the change note.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > It looks sufficient to get +1.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi folks,
>> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For release,
>> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and
>> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again.
>> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo
>> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have
>> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm
>> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very
>> > > interesting news in Apache blog.
>> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0
>> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are
>> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be
>> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which
>> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0.
>> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
>> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release.
>> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea.
>> > > Best regards,
>> > > Hyunsik
>> >
>>