Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tajo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@tajo.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAM=XDd8nPb2RXh-oeM_yCc-WB+yCNiyF28=EZ_5gOBO1M1EDHA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAM=XDd-rYOoG5GxLNmterXgkEaLT3Oqh6y6RTftEw6LMFYSXrw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1410960438252.0ce1b659@Nodemailer>
	<CA+OkO53e2aiwQUaCXXMgHVZz0=UyGnSEoWVD67Vx_vfEhE3kdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACZfFK4MUM8tiMRj7P23m34DLbs=2M_LJ8n3cuHWDBDGkQcRrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM=XDd_Ox5pY7mgS-fAAkSPhvpdzKQ_pHLgVReHsifqJneVo6A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM=XDd8k44Jtw+9xh+h=cHFYYWLpdh6N8J0EJ+7iEMqOpZ_B-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM=XDd8nPb2RXh-oeM_yCc-WB+yCNiyF28=EZ_5gOBO1M1EDHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:39:00 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAM=XDd_H8UFqpspnh8d35ecTP5mQ4Q65zNF6gPuR=w1g5zk5Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 0.9.0 release
From: Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
To: "dev@tajo.apache.org" <dev@tajo.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Most of remain issues scheduled to 0.9.0 are patch available. I think
that we can start 0.9.0 release process soon.

- Hyunsik

On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:
> I've checked the user document of development version. Some pages are
> outdated. In addition to adding new docs, we need to update docs for
> 0.9.0 release.
>
> I've described what we need to update in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1052. It would be great if
> you guys take and resolve some of them.
>
> Thanks,
> Hyunsik
>
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've rescheduled the remain issues which are not critical in 0.9.0.
>>
>> The remain issues are as follows:
>> http://goo.gl/dJ9X9F
>>
>> If there are more issues which should be resolved in 0.9.0, feel free
>> to reschedule them.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hyunsik
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Yes, I totally agree with you guys. We need to update documentation.
>>> Actually, I expect that our documentation explains about 1/3 features
>>> of all features that Tajo provide.
>>>
>>> I've created the jira issue for 0.9.0 documentation, and I've moved
>>> the jira issue from 0.8.0 documentation issue to new jira. We also
>>> need to create more jira for new and updated documentation. Feel free
>>> to create new jira.
>>>
>>> Also, I'll reschedule some jira issues which are not critical to next version.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Hyunsik
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jihoon Son <jihoonson@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>> I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release.
>>>> Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule them for future
>>>> releases.
>>>> Here is my +1.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think that it will
>>>> helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example, each of
>>>> us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on that topic are
>>>> resolved.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jihoon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <maihaithanh@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and complete
>>>>> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice if there
>>>>> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>> Thanh
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <eminency@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > I glanced the change note.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It looks sufficient to get +1.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > Hi folks,
>>>>> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For release,
>>>>> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and
>>>>> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again.
>>>>> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo
>>>>> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have
>>>>> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm
>>>>> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very
>>>>> > > interesting news in Apache blog.
>>>>> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0
>>>>> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are
>>>>> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be
>>>>> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which
>>>>> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0.
>>>>> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
>>>>> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release.
>>>>> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea.
>>>>> > > Best regards,
>>>>> > > Hyunsik
>>>>> >
>>>>>