Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tajo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@tajo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of maihaithanh@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1410960438252.0ce1b659@Nodemailer>
References: 
 <CAM=XDd-rYOoG5GxLNmterXgkEaLT3Oqh6y6RTftEw6LMFYSXrw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1410960438252.0ce1b659@Nodemailer>
From: Thanh Mai <maihaithanh@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:14:35 +0900
Message-ID: 
 <CA+OkO53e2aiwQUaCXXMgHVZz0=UyGnSEoWVD67Vx_vfEhE3kdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 0.9.0 release
To: dev@tajo.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec548a1d1c5654205034bdfd6

--bcaec548a1d1c5654205034bdfd6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,

I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and complete
documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice if there
will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects.

Sincerely,
Thanh


On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <eminency@gmail.com> wrote:

> I glanced the change note.
>
>
>
>
> It looks sufficient to get +1.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For release,
> > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and
> > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again.
> > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo
> > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have
> > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm
> > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very
> > interesting news in Apache blog.
> > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0
> > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are
> > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be
> > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which
> > must be resolved in 0.9.0.
> > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
> > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release.
> > Please feel free to suggest your idea.
> > Best regards,
> > Hyunsik
>

--bcaec548a1d1c5654205034bdfd6--