Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tajo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@tajo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eminency@gmail.com designates
 209.85.192.45 as permitted sender)
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 06:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <1410960438252.0ce1b659@Nodemailer>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAM=XDd-rYOoG5GxLNmterXgkEaLT3Oqh6y6RTftEw6LMFYSXrw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAM=XDd-rYOoG5GxLNmterXgkEaLT3Oqh6y6RTftEw6LMFYSXrw@mail.gmail.com>
From: eminency@gmail.com
To: dev@tajo.apache.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.0 release
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="----Nodemailer-0.5.0-?=_1-1410960438950"

------Nodemailer-0.5.0-?=_1-1410960438950
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I glanced the change note.


It looks sufficient to get +1.


Thanks.

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi folks,
> Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For release,
> I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and
> arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again.
> Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo
> much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have
> made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm
> very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very
> interesting news in Apache blog.
> As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0
> release. How about your think=3F Currently, even though 50 issues are
> still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be
> rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which
> must be resolved in 0.9.0.
> If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
> trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release.
> Please feel free to suggest your idea.
> Best regards,
> Hyunsik
------Nodemailer-0.5.0-?=_1-1410960438950--