tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hyunsik Choi <hyun...@apache.org>
Subject Re: 0.9.0 release
Date Sun, 21 Sep 2014 19:41:32 GMT
Hi folks,

I've rescheduled the remain issues which are not critical in 0.9.0.

The remain issues are as follows:
http://goo.gl/dJ9X9F

If there are more issues which should be resolved in 0.9.0, feel free
to reschedule them.

Thanks,
Hyunsik

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes, I totally agree with you guys. We need to update documentation.
> Actually, I expect that our documentation explains about 1/3 features
> of all features that Tajo provide.
>
> I've created the jira issue for 0.9.0 documentation, and I've moved
> the jira issue from 0.8.0 documentation issue to new jira. We also
> need to create more jira for new and updated documentation. Feel free
> to create new jira.
>
> Also, I'll reschedule some jira issues which are not critical to next version.
>
> Best regards,
> Hyunsik
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jihoon Son <jihoonson@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release.
>> Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule them for future
>> releases.
>> Here is my +1.
>>
>> Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think that it will
>> helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example, each of
>> us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on that topic are
>> resolved.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jihoon
>>
>>
>> 2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <maihaithanh@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and complete
>>> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice if there
>>> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Thanh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <eminency@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I glanced the change note.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > It looks sufficient to get +1.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Thanks.
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi folks,
>>> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For release,
>>> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and
>>> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again.
>>> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo
>>> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have
>>> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm
>>> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very
>>> > > interesting news in Apache blog.
>>> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0
>>> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are
>>> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be
>>> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which
>>> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0.
>>> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
>>> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release.
>>> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea.
>>> > > Best regards,
>>> > > Hyunsik
>>> >
>>>

Mime
View raw message