tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] 0.8 release preparation
Date Fri, 21 Feb 2014 19:09:38 GMT
Sorry for late response Hyunsik.

Thx for creating new branch for 0.8 release.

- Henry

On Thursday, February 20, 2014, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:

> Thank you all guys for responses.
>
> I've created new branch 0.8.0.
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tajo.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/branch-0.8.0
>
> - hyunsik
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:30 PM, CharSyam <charsyam@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1!!
> >
> >
> > 2014-02-20 10:27 GMT+09:00 ktpark <sirpkt@apache.org>:
> >
> > > +1 !
> > >
> > > 2014. 2. 20., 오전 10:26, Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org> 작성:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > -Jinho
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2014-02-20 10:12 GMT+09:00 JaeHwa Jung <jhjung@gruter.com>:
> > > >
> > > >> +1! :)
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> 2014-02-20 10:00 GMT+09:00 Min Zhou <coderplay@gmail.com>:
> > > >>
> > > >>> +1 for the approach.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Min
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Jihoon Son <ghoonson@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> +1!
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> 2014-02-20 9:50 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> There remain few issues for 0.8. After 0.8, we will refactor
> > resource
> > > >>>>> manager, scheduler, and the design of worker part for
> multi-tenancy
> > > >>>>> support. For this, we need to separate the branches right
now. If
> > > >> there
> > > >>>> are
> > > >>>>> no objection, I'll create a branch for 0.8. The remain
issues for
> > 0.8
> > > >>>> will
> > > >>>>> be merged to both 0.8 and master branches.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> - hyunsik
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org
> >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Henry,
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I appreciate for correcting my wrong statements. You
are right.
> We
> > > >>> will
> > > >>>>>> release 0.8 three months after 0.2 release.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I don't think that we want to release 0.8 before potential
> > > >>> graduation,
> > > >>>>> and
> > > >>>>>> it may be hard to do so even if we want. This is because
there
> > > >> still
> > > >>>>> remain
> > > >>>>>> some critical issues that we cannot postpone anymore.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> The main objective of my claim aforementioned is to
make two
> > > >> branches
> > > >>>> for
> > > >>>>>> development after 0.8 release.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Regards,
> > > >>>>>> Hyunsik
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Henry Saputra <
> > hsaputra@apache.org
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Hi Hyunsik, I think you meant will release 0.8
three months
> after
> > > >>> 0.2
> > > >>>>>>> release?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Do we want to release 0.8 quickly before potential
graduation
> > > >> VOTE?
> > > >>>>>>> If we do then maybe we could remove the more issues,
such as
> the
> > > >>>>>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message