tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ktpark <sir...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] 0.8 release preparation
Date Thu, 20 Feb 2014 01:27:07 GMT
+1 !

2014. 2. 20., 오전 10:26, Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org> 작성:

> +1
> 
> -Jinho
> 
> 
> 2014-02-20 10:12 GMT+09:00 JaeHwa Jung <jhjung@gruter.com>:
> 
>> +1! :)
>> 
>> 
>> 2014-02-20 10:00 GMT+09:00 Min Zhou <coderplay@gmail.com>:
>> 
>>> +1 for the approach.
>>> 
>>> Min
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Jihoon Son <ghoonson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 2014-02-20 9:50 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>:
>>>> 
>>>>> There remain few issues for 0.8. After 0.8, we will refactor resource
>>>>> manager, scheduler, and the design of worker part for multi-tenancy
>>>>> support. For this, we need to separate the branches right now. If
>> there
>>>> are
>>>>> no objection, I'll create a branch for 0.8. The remain issues for 0.8
>>>> will
>>>>> be merged to both 0.8 and master branches.
>>>>> 
>>>>> - hyunsik
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Henry,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I appreciate for correcting my wrong statements. You are right. We
>>> will
>>>>>> release 0.8 three months after 0.2 release.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I don't think that we want to release 0.8 before potential
>>> graduation,
>>>>> and
>>>>>> it may be hard to do so even if we want. This is because there
>> still
>>>>> remain
>>>>>> some critical issues that we cannot postpone anymore.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The main objective of my claim aforementioned is to make two
>> branches
>>>> for
>>>>>> development after 0.8 release.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Hyunsik
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Henry Saputra <hsaputra@apache.org
>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Hyunsik, I think you meant will release 0.8 three months after
>>> 0.2
>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Do we want to release 0.8 quickly before potential graduation
>> VOTE?
>>>>>>> If we do then maybe we could remove the more issues, such as
the
>>>>>>> sub-tasks and improvement, and keep only blocking issues.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Henry
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I'm rescheduling non-critical issues scheduled in 0.8 to
next
>>>> release.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm considering the next release versions. So far, we have
had
>>> long
>>>>> term
>>>>>>>> for each release. We released 0.2 seven months after incubation.
>>> We
>>>>> also
>>>>>>>> released 0.8 three months after 0.2 release. It is because
Tajo
>>> has
>>>>> been
>>>>>>>> heavy under development status.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Tajo 0.8 seems a product ready level. I'm expecting that
there
>>> would
>>>>> be
>>>>>>>> additional use cases on products. In order to support them,
we
>>> need
>>>> to
>>>>>>>> release Tajo more frequently with hotfixs.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> So, I would like to propose the develpment based on two
>> branches,
>>>>> which
>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>> is 0.8.x branch and 1.0 branch (master branch in git). 0.8.x
>>> branch
>>>>>>> will be
>>>>>>>> frequently released with hotfixes and new lightwight features.
>> 1.0
>>>>>>> branch will
>>>>>>>> be developed for a complete system. It will embrace even
radical
>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>> and new features. The next major release, probably 0.9, would
be
>>>>>>> branched
>>>>>>>> from 1.0 branch.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> If you have any idea, feel free to suggest.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> - hyunsik
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:30 AM, JaeHwa Jung <
>> jhjung@gruter.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Sorry guys, I missed prerequisite.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 2014/1/20 JaeHwa Jung <jhjung@gruter.com>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> +1 for your idea.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I also think that this is right time for 0.8 release.
>>>>>>>>>> As you mentioned, too time-consuming jobs need to
fix for
>> next
>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> And we need to check 0.8 document again because there
are not
>>>> some
>>>>>>> basic
>>>>>>>>>> features for users. For example, there is nothing
about
>> hadoop
>>>>>>> version.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 2014/1/18 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> It seems to be right time to think about the
0.8-incubating
>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>> Please take a look at the 0.8 roadmap and the
current
>> resolved
>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> - 0.8 Roadmap
>>>>>>>>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/tajo/Roadmap
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> - 0.8 unresolved issues
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.8-incubating%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Most of scheduled feature are all implemented.
Some issues,
>>>>>>> push-based
>>>>>>>>>>> transmission and improvement of intermediate
data, are
>>>> unresolved
>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>> far. However, in my point of view, they are not
critical in
>>> this
>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>>>> I think they can be scheduled to next release.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Although there are still bugs listed in 0.8 unresolved
>> issues,
>>>> we
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>> resolve most of them soon if we concentrate on
bug fix.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> So, if you agree, I would like to suggest to
prepare 0.8
>>>> release.
>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> just listed some issues which must be resolved
for 0.8
>> release
>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-512.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I will wait your idea and suggestion.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Hyunsik
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Jaehwa Jung
>>>>>>>>>> Bigdata Platform Team
>>>>>>>>>> Gruter
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Jaehwa Jung
>>>>>>>>> Bigdata Platform Team
>>>>>>>>> Gruter
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Jihoon Son
>>>> 
>>>> Database & Information Systems Group,
>>>> Prof. Yon Dohn Chung Lab.
>>>> Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering,
>>>> Korea University
>>>> 1, 5-ga, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu,
>>>> Seoul, 136-713, Republic of Korea
>>>> 
>>>> Tel : +82-2-3290-3580
>>>> E-mail : jihoonson@korea.ac.kr
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> My research interests are distributed systems, parallel computing and
>>> bytecode based virtual machine.
>>> 
>>> My profile:
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/coderplay
>>> My blog:
>>> http://coderplay.javaeye.com
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Jaehwa Jung
>> Bigdata Platform Team
>> Gruter
>> 


Mime
View raw message