tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jaehwa Jung (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (TAJO-433) Improve integration with Hive
Date Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:24:50 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13860300#comment-13860300
] 

Jaehwa Jung commented on TAJO-433:
----------------------------------

Hi, guys.
I think this issue is ready to be closed and committed. Can anybody review it? :)

> Improve integration with Hive
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-433
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-433
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: catalog
>    Affects Versions: 0.8-incubating
>            Reporter: Jaehwa Jung
>            Assignee: Jaehwa Jung
>             Fix For: 0.8-incubating
>
>         Attachments: TAJO-433.patch
>
>
> Hi, guys~ 
> I wish to discuss about HCatalogStore. 
> HiveMetaStore types consists of three types: embedded, local, remote. 
> This type will set up at hive configuration file which named 'hive-site.xml' and HiveMetaStoreClient
can use MetaStore by configuration file. So, if Tajo have only to add hive configuration file
to classpath, Tajo can use HiveMetaStore with HiveMetaStoreClient. 
> But current HCatalogStore set up configurations about HiveMetaStore as follows:
> - hive.metastore.uris
> - hive.metastore.kerberos.principal
> - hive.metastore.local
> - hive.metastore.sasl.enabled
> And Tajo doesn't need 'tajo.catalog.uri' property because 'hive-site.xml' already includes
metastore host and port. So, it looks like unnecessary settings. 
> What do you think about this suggestion? :)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Mime
View raw message