Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tajo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tajo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 712DB109A3 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59630 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2013 06:53:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tajo-dev-archive@tajo.apache.org Received: (qmail 59547 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2013 06:53:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tajo.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@tajo.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tajo.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59538 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2013 06:53:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:53:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.3] (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:53:11 +0000 Received: (qmail 59435 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2013 06:52:50 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:52:50 +0000 Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:52:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Keuntae Park (JIRA)" To: dev@tajo.incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (TAJO-448) Timestamp should be based on unixtime MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13855446#comment-13855446 ] Keuntae Park commented on TAJO-448: ----------------------------------- It looks good to me, too. But, are 32 bits enough to represent unix time? 32 bits unix time only supports up to 2038-01-19 and PostgreSQL looks to support bigger than 32 bits unix time. > Timestamp should be based on unixtime > ------------------------------------- > > Key: TAJO-448 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-448 > Project: Tajo > Issue Type: Bug > Components: data type > Reporter: Hyunsik Choi > Assignee: Hyunsik Choi > Fix For: 0.8-incubating > > Attachments: TAJO-448.patch > > > The current timestamp type is based on milliseconds. This patch changes timestamp type to be based on unixtime. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160)